|
by Washington Post 03/14/2017, 5:27pm PDT |
|
|
|
|
|
and not just Mischief leaping to sexism accusations because a feminist once gave him some pussy in college
blackwater wrote:
I've been in Silicon Valley for more than a decade working at more companies than I'd like to admit. Both small and large.
"Diversity hires" are very important. Not having enough women or certain minorities can expose the company to lawsuits. So the scales are really tipped in favor of any woman or minority whose resume comes across the hiring manager's desk. It's just basic arithmetic: 95 male resumes come across your desk, and 5 female ones. But your boss says you need at least 80/20 in the group or else red flags will be raised. So what do you do? You have to lower the standards for the 5%. Make no mistake: companies like Google have quotas for the number of women and minorities in certain groups, and when bosses don't meet those quotas they are punished.
I've been on lots of interview panels. At one point I was giving 3 interviews a week. I can tell you that it's very rare for any reasonably competent women to get a no-hire. Having a background in the field or being passionate about the job are very important for most engineers, but female applicants can bypass those requirements. To give a no-hire, you would essentially need "the headshot"-- something they said that was so wrong, that it demonstrates a huge amount of ignorance-- like saying sorting a list is O(1) or something.
This is some good stuff. Some actual meaningful numbers, access to the interview and hiring process, and knowledge of terms for what it would take for women applicants not to get hired. Compare this to the reply 2 posts up that just dumps a letter grade and "WONDER WHY" to the question that men can slip past any fuckup filters.....so, why? Were they implying that the interviews for men consisted of crushing vodka red bulls over foosball games while Bang Bus videos played in the background? So it's that claim vs blackwater's detailed account claiming the opposite. Somehow I believe the latter more (WONDER WHY). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They fucking went with Perez. Are they TRYING to make Trump a 2-termer? NT by MM 02/25/2017, 1:39pm PST
Addicted to Unhappiness NT by Martha Heineman Pieper, PhD 02/25/2017, 1:54pm PST
Yeah we could have chipped away at Trumps white supremacist support by going by with Keith Ellison 02/25/2017, 2:12pm PST
Thanks, David Brock. NT by MM 02/25/2017, 2:21pm PST
Glad that you're willing to overlook Jew hatred to get your UBI check NT by you principle-less fuck 02/25/2017, 3:24pm PST
Hi jsoh! NT by MM 02/25/2017, 3:56pm PST
house calls. NT by lol 02/25/2017, 3:04pm PST
So who's it gonna be in 2020? Cory "tits" Booker? Or... by Mischief Maker 02/26/2017, 4:36pm PST
The left's version of McCain (they might actually run McCain), banking on a NT by charismatic "outsider" in 2024. 02/26/2017, 5:04pm PST
How does Chelsea not perfectly fit the ideals of BrandNewCongress? NT by your beloved Bernie's child 02/26/2017, 7:31pm PST
Re: So who's it gonna be in 2020? Cory "tits" Booker? Or... by t. fox news 02/27/2017, 6:38am PST
Whoops I'm an idiot NT by t. fox news 02/27/2017, 10:31am PST
How to perfectly predict every political outcome: see what MoveOn supports NT by and bet the exact opposite 02/26/2017, 5:49pm PST
Ha ha! Speak of the devil by and bet the exact opposite 03/09/2017, 12:53am PST
Smashing success like Buy Nothing Day NT by haha oh wait 03/09/2017, 6:43pm PST
Even we're calling them fags by Washington Post 03/09/2017, 8:07pm PST
Your example applies equally to male coworkers. NT by MM 03/09/2017, 8:53pm PST
What example? by Washington Post 03/09/2017, 9:59pm PST
Duh, MM. The mockery is in limp, ineffectual protest tourism by Not gender 03/09/2017, 10:24pm PST
Let's have an honest poll of everyone's confirmation biases... by guy with axe to grind 03/10/2017, 8:32am PST
It's hard to dismiss your answer when you don't give one by Washington Post 03/10/2017, 3:28pm PST
So it WASN'T jsoh who was going around calling Keith Ellison an anti-semite? NT by MM 03/10/2017, 3:44pm PST
Twasnt me either by Washington Post 03/10/2017, 3:46pm PST
No wonder you disagree with me so much. Your logic's faulty! NT by MM 03/10/2017, 4:21pm PST
Mostly male field. Avg woman here is 1.3x as good as her avg male colleague by because she has to be? 03/14/2017, 11:10am PDT
Smiling is slavery! by Washington Post 03/11/2017, 9:31am PST
I have not personally seen sexism in Silicon Valley by blackwater 03/14/2017, 3:55pm PDT
Finally a real answer! by Washington Post 03/14/2017, 5:27pm PDT
I would've liked more recognition of the role blowjobs play in ladies getting by regular jobs. 03/14/2017, 6:39pm PDT
During #gg's height I was considered Caltrops' resident misogynist. by Mischief Maker 03/14/2017, 7:39pm PDT
Don't flatter yourself. Nobody's taking that title away from the Cables NT by Like anyone could 03/14/2017, 9:11pm PDT
no, you weren't NT by citation needed 03/14/2017, 11:29pm PDT
The last time I was involved in a hiring by A reg 03/14/2017, 8:13pm PDT
Sounds about right-- game companies are known to be slave ships by blackwater 03/14/2017, 10:50pm PDT
How was your "day without women"? NT by Mine? Pretty damn good. 03/10/2017, 2:33pm PST
National Bros Without Hoes day NT by aka National Caltrops Day 03/11/2017, 11:29am PST
This works really well by skip 03/11/2017, 9:58am PST
What about the supposed Russian collusion at all levels, and leaks? by Beszos Blog 03/11/2017, 12:04pm PST
|
|