 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| It just seems like it's moving towards desktop application style MVC by Entropy Stew 10/18/2017, 5:49pm PDT | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| If Angular-style apps were so easy to make with MVC then nobody would have bothered. I don't know what kind of ubermensch coders you've worked with, but every piecemeal ajaxified pile of templates I've looked at has been a confusing mess, and, as big and confusing as something like Angular might be, I can't see it being worse.
I like React more, though. At least conceptually. Hell, even Vue. Take this with giant salt grains because I have still not made the jump to JS everything style webshits. -/ES/- |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Angular: Why? by 10/18/2017, 10:59am PDT  It just seems like it's moving towards desktop application style MVC by 10/18/2017, 5:49pm PDT Re: It just seems like it's moving towards desktop application style MVC by 10/19/2017, 1:09pm PDT It is being used for traditional sites. by 10/19/2017, 6:38pm PDT Yes. React is FRP-inspired and FRP is nigh panacea by 10/19/2017, 10:26pm PDT See, React looks like something I can get behind by 10/20/2017, 11:13am PDT I think the answer here is that we all more or less agree and are right-thinking NT by 10/20/2017, 12:09pm PDT It's probably better for traditional sites than the other js frameworks by 10/19/2017, 10:19pm PDT Wait until you see how many mb the browser downloads for Angular... NT by 10/19/2017, 4:55am PDT |
