Forum Overview :: Soul Reaver 2: Dissonance of Irony
 
Re: Read by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/10/2003, 3:06am PDT
Senor Barborito wrote:

Here.

While this doesn't apply to us specifically (we aren't a commercial service), this is why our hosts have their panties in a bunch. If analrape.com is any kind of commercial service and Alt789 can access their pics (backdoor, etc.), they're liable for $50,000 / 6 months in prison, and possibly a whole lot more. You know how our hosts, for instance, have another restriction I didn't mention like "DON'T EVER USE THE SHELL WE GIVE YOU TO RUN IRC BOTS" because that invariably leads to people using their service for DDoS? Same reason they get fidgety here. As for lawsuit - there's a good chance she could at least get it far enough (anywhere beyond initial hearing) that ES or I would have to pay for a lawyer, at which point this entire site would cease to exist.

I know nothing I say is going to make you believe me - but once again I fucking hate banning people. I do it because unlike Chet ES, V, and I live on a monetary razor's edge so sharp you could split your pubic hairs with it. I can't afford to dick around with lawyers so I have to play preemptive lawyer to the best of my ability. Once my involvement with the site is effectively ended because UNIX knowledge has been supplanted by rather easy-to-use web interfaces for the new admin team (the code is working as of right now barring a few miscellaneous functions), they'll more or less slowly introduce their own rules that fit their budgets and knowledge of the law.

--SB


I WOULD COUNT ALL THE PORN SITES THAT ARE SUED FROM NOT BANNING MINORS BUT THEN I WOULD RUN OUT OF FINGERS AND TOES!
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Pulling a Zseni (only with angst instead of granny porn) by Alternate789 09/03/2003, 4:45pm PDT NEW
    Re: Pulling a Zseni (only with angst instead of granny porn) by laudablepuss 09/03/2003, 4:56pm PDT NEW
        BRAIN MELTING PLAY ON WORDS DEATH IMPENDING DOOOOOOM NT by Lizard_King 09/03/2003, 5:14pm PDT NEW
            Yeah, no shit. Holy shit. What the shit? Shut the fuck up, Laudable. NT by I need clarification 09/04/2003, 1:06am PDT NEW
                Fuck. Above retracted due to INC's agreement. NT by Lizard_King 09/04/2003, 12:21pm PDT NEW
        IOU 1 (one) fatal beating NT by Entropy Stew 09/04/2003, 3:54pm PDT NEW
            I AM POPULAR! by laudablepuss 09/04/2003, 4:07pm PDT NEW
    Done. Let me know if you can still post - you're on a dynamic IP by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 9:38pm PDT NEW
        Note - 'some other people' does not equal anyone around here by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 9:39pm PDT NEW
            Re: Note - 'some other people' does not equal anyone around here by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/04/2003, 7:31pm PDT NEW
        Yeah, I can still post by Alternate789 09/08/2003, 7:22pm PDT NEW
            Not anymore you can't. My apologies to any lurkers from 209.210.x.x NT by Senor Barborito 09/08/2003, 9:20pm PDT NEW
            Why can't you just not come here, you miserable faggot? by laudablepuss 09/09/2003, 11:04am PDT NEW
                Re: Why can't you just not come here, you miserable faggot? by bastage 09/09/2003, 1:16pm PDT NEW
                I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. NT by Senor Barborito 09/09/2003, 1:24pm PDT NEW
                    Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by bastage 09/09/2003, 1:49pm PDT NEW
                        Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by curst 09/09/2003, 7:43pm PDT NEW
                            Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by bastage 09/09/2003, 9:49pm PDT NEW
                                Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by Fullofkittens 09/09/2003, 10:23pm PDT NEW
                                This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. NT by Senor Barborito 09/09/2003, 10:53pm PDT NEW
                                    Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by bastage 09/09/2003, 11:11pm PDT NEW
                                        Read by Senor Barborito 09/10/2003, 1:55am PDT NEW
                                            Re: Read by /16 COPA violation 09/10/2003, 2:44am PDT NEW
                                            Re: Read by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/10/2003, 3:06am PDT NEW
                                                DO THE MATH!!!!!! NT by Creexul's aunt 09/10/2003, 4:19am PDT NEW
                                    Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by laudablepuss 09/10/2003, 3:20am PDT NEW
                                        Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by Master I/O 09/10/2003, 3:39am PDT NEW
                                            Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/10/2003, 6:12pm PDT NEW
                                Oh, and to your second question - no, it can't be used to DoS by Senor Barborito 09/10/2003, 1:44am PDT NEW
                                    I'll believe it when I see the body. by My Stereo 09/10/2003, 1:47am PDT NEW
                                    Another loser bites the dust! by I need clarification 09/10/2003, 3:56am PDT NEW
    I think it was in Queen of The Damned... by Fullofkittens 09/09/2003, 8:04pm PDT NEW
        You just answered your own question. NT by Senor Barborito 09/09/2003, 11:07pm PDT NEW
        It's because they can't take RESPONSIBILITY for their ACTIONS by Crazed_Elderly_Vampire_Lizard_King 09/10/2003, 6:03pm PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy