Caltrops - We Love Katamari





	[quote name="Ice Cream Jonsey"]I've never pointed this out before because I like the site and I like the writers. But what the fuck did RPS do to attract these losers in their comments? Let's take a close look over the course of this week to see what pieces of shit they are. Add your own examples. There's the article with new X-COM screens: [quote]Cinnamon says:01/31/2012 at 15:18 I hope that you asked them if we can have a 1994 mode with things like no rpg class system and full squad sizes from the start.[/quote] Yes, asshole, we all give a shit about your hopes. This guy's bad, especially for a first post, but immediately trumped by the second post: [quote]Dana says:01/31/2012 at 15:35 No. If I will want 1994, Ill play games from 1994. I dont want same game with new graphics, that would be pointless and a waste of cash.[/quote] SOMEONE had to be buying failed X-COM clone after failed X-COM clone. Stupid fuck "Dana" doesn't understand why he's reading this particular article (it's because people have failed to make a follow-up to X-COM since 1995) but felt the need to tell everyone what he wouldn't be buying. ... Even though new graphics and a new interface is all anyone wants out of an X-COM game at the moment, due to how many shitty failures there have been. It's like this with EVERY THREAD, though. Smug, condescending, argumentative fucks acting like queens. The site's great and I'm glad they're all making plenty of money. They deserve it for having to sometimes interact with their readers. ICJ[/quote]