Forum Overview :: Jordan Peterson - Hero or Hate Crime? :: That's what Peterson was talking about

[quote name="Roop"][quote name="Mischief Maker"][quote name="Roop"]You know that Charles Darwin is highly problematic, there's not much equality of outcome in his models.[/quote] A lot of you guys are computer programmers. I'm not, and I know I'm not. So I know well enough that when you guys talk about different programming languages not to butt in with, "My dudes! Quick programming tip, don't put the line GOTO 10 at the end of your program, or the 'puter gets stuck in a loop, and then the only thing you can do is unplug it from the wall. Oh, hey! No need to pay me a consulting fee for my 1337 knowledge drop, that one was on the house!" But when I point out that Jordan Peterson's legal interpretation of C-16 was hilariously wrong, or he says something dead-wrong about genetics, here you strut up to me with all the confidence in the world saying things like, "You know, Darwin said something about, like, 'survival of the fittest,' and that doesn't sound very sound very politically correct to me, bro!"[/quote] I'm not a computer programmer either, have made my living as an artist, come from a family of artists. So since we're bitching about appeals to authority here, how come every motherfucker and his mother has an opinion about <i>arrrrrrrrrrt,</i> and none of these assholes can even agree what art even is? <i>Are games art?</i> Sheeeeeeeit. I know what you're saying brother! Amen! Everybody's talking out their ass! However: I've known enough qualified experts artists who know absolutely nothing about art to know there's plenty of qualified legal experts who talk out out their ass as well as qualified expert surgeons who kill patients as well as military experts who lose wars. So anyway, I read the bill, and I know enough when I'm doing that to go and then read the other code the original bill refers to, so I did that, and it wasn't very much and was pretty straight forward. I'm not an expert in any of this Canadian law, like you said! So I read criticism from some guy who apparently is an expert, and they conveniently left out the other part, that other code I read, so I suspect a political agenda going on again. Whatever, none of it really matters until they start enforcing it, right? Good thing it's already unconstitutional in this country, so I really don't have to care! So Peterson is a crackpot for being against something that would never fly where you are the legal expert. Fuck that crackpot constitution, right Mischief Maker? [/quote]