Caltrops - Cleve Blakemore's Grimoire





	[quote name="mark"][quote name="<a href="http://crookedtimber.org/2005/02/21/atkins-and-pollard/">Cleve Blackmore</a>"] Will you liberals please stop bashing Atkins corpse. There’s nothing that triggers the hive swarming reflex in the idiot left like the appearance of a true genius. Atkins passed more brain cells during his last bowel movement than any of you communists will ever possess in your tiny shrunken skulls. I’m not going to even waste my time explaining how the Doc, the ultimate bad-ass of weight loss, figured out the insulin or sleep connection and started what amounts to a revolution in the medical sciences perhaps on the trail of cancer itself. It’s too exhausting. Read LIGHTS OUT : SLEEP, SUGAR AND SURVIVAL. Assuming liberals actually read books. I strongly suspect they buy them and leave them out on coffee tables to try to impress their phoney velvet-and-polyester wearing arthouse geek buddies. They should dig Atkins up so you chimps can plant a kiss on the arse of homo superior and at least get a glimpse of the next stage in human evolution – or at least the one that comes after you, anyway. Posted by Cleve Blakemore · February 21st, 2005 at 4:06 pm Jif, I’d like to congratulate you on your circa 1940’s roundup of current scientific thinking on weight loss. I have struggled not to be exposed to anything written after 1946 but weak character has found me poring over modern medical literature at times despite my best efforts. Another reason why leftists suck – they are ALWAYS behind the intellectual power curve. They will be arguing rabidly in an empty stadium while tumbleweeds blow past, not realizing the argument has moved on some time ago. Because of Atkins, jif, modern people have begun to realize just what the relationship is between insulin and the 400 lbs of raw white sugar and corn syrup we put into our bodies each year. Calling Atkins a genius is an understatement – the guy was not just brilliant beyond description, he was a modest innovator well over a hundred years past our time. I can tell by your post you have no idea what I’m talking about. It’s the eternal sunshine of the spotless leftist mind. Posted by Cleve Blakemore · February 22nd, 2005 at 1:36 am [/quote] [quote name="<a href="http://crookedtimber.org/2005/03/01/my-most-imaginary-friend/">Cleve Blakemore</a>"] None of you guys have actual, real day jobs, do you? You must definitely be academic parasites on some kind of tenure or grant system. What do you call a bus of a hundred liberals going over a cliff with two seats empty? A crying shame. How can you tell a dead dog from a dead liberal? Skid marks in front of the dog. Reverse marks after the liberal. What do you say to a liberal who draws down a paycheck in the private sector? Fries and a coke, please. When liberals die, why do they end up in limbo? Because even hell has standards. Posted by Cleve Blakemore · March 2nd, 2005 at 12:59 am Ha! You’re a funny guy. I was independently wealthy by the time I was 34 from software development. No college education, in fact no formal education of any kind. You keep studying obscure navel gazing metaphysics, dude, I just know that is going to pay off for you one of these days. There’s a huge demand for that stuff amongst other navel gazers, alas, who tend to be dead broke professors and other assorted uni losers and parasites. Remember, it’s all about figuring out how to never actually graduate. That way you’ll never have to become a man, abandon your hebephrenic and neurotic fixation on rubbish or stop collecting Pez dispensers and go to get a job. Posted by Cleve Blakemore · March 2nd, 2005 at 3:01 am rckn thr sn’t nythng n Gd’s grn rth mr wrtchd, mr hds r dsfgrd nsd nd t thn th lftst. Lstnng t ths knd f dbt vr mtphyscs rgmnt s dffrnt frm 14th cntry dscssn bt hw mny ngls cn dnc n th hd f pn – hw? Th tpc s dffrnt, sm chmp gbbrsh. Th lbrl mnd s wht s lft bhnd whn gntc slctn nds nd th spcs bgns t drft nt nknwn trrtry – plc whr th btchd nd bngld srvv n sffcnt nmbrs t frm thr wn pltcl grps. lbrl sn’t hmn bng. t’s gntc trn wrck wth bck stry. t’s chrmsml cr crsh wth lng wndd “nrrtv.” t’s th gy sldg lft t th bttm f th tb whn th rtfcl nsmntn ffrt gs hrrbly wrng. f ll th nfrr nd bdly dptd xtnct nmls frm th 99% spcs tht hv csd t xst n th rth cld ll b gvn n vc t spk n sngl bttr dnnctn f vrythng tht s sn nd hlthy, t wld cm t sndng xctly lk th dscssn bv. Th lft – t’s th ppst f gd. t’s wht hppns whn crttrs tht wld nrmlly crwl wy nt hl prvtly t xpr nstd cm t nt th snlght t hld gndr dntty smnrs. Th lft s wht rmns bhnd ftr vrythng sfl hs bn xcsd. t’s th lngg f prsts nd tcks wh nd n plgst fr wht t s thy d. Lbrls stl mny thrgh cnnng nd cll t thr vrt. T tht nd, thy nd vst lbyrnthn st f cnfsng bscrntst phlsphs whch thy thmslvs blv n frst, bfr thy cn sll th l t thrs. Th lbrls r th rgnl thrs f th l tslf. Ths nclds th lbrls n th Wht Hs nd thr nblrs. Th whl lt f y rn’t wrth cp f pss t Mthr Ntr nd shmfl brgtn f hr bqthd dts nd rspnsblts. Lbrls r nt-mttr, thy r th xprssn f th drk sd f th nvrs whr vrythng nds t’s xstnc sckd dwn nt blck hl f mnnglssnss. Th lft s dth klt, pln nd smpl. Th ncns r th mst prmnnt xprssn f th lft n pblc lf – t dsn’t mttr tht thy clm t b n “ppstn,” bcs th lft s n lngr n ppstn th scndd Strssn prfctn f th lft’s dth wsh s fnd n th rs f th ncn dmns. Posted by Cleve Blakemore · March 2nd, 2005 at 1:16 pm I’d like to respond, but the moderator of this board feels the need to either delete my posts or else run them deliberately through a scrambler. Yes, that’s what you do when somebody presents an uncomfortable viewpoint that is false – you delete the post. Actually, that is what liberals do when somebody posts uncomfortable truths. It’s classic, classic liberal behaviour. The reality is, liberals are weak and shallow men who cannot defend their own viewpoints. That’s why conservatives are always censored, anywhere you look on the web. You should see what happened over on the “Black and White” thread when I wrote a long, patient post about why blacks produce no great or even good writers. The moderator was sweating bullets and insisted on deleting the post as well as the one that followed it. I’m just jerking your chains, anyway. I browsed here for a long time for a laugh to see how the academic halfwits talk privately amongst themselves. It’s exactly the kind of childish, hebephrenic rubbish that conservatives are always saying it is. The post above that got scrambled was just hitting a little too close to the bone for the moderator – it was just too penetrating of the liberal mind. Remember, speech is free around liberals as long as you play into their basic premises, which are infantile rehashed failed ideas from previous socialist losers. Trying to force them to swallow the red pill and make them go through the looking glass only throws them into a tizzy and they run around shrieking and bawling like 8 year old girls crying out for a censor. Last post. Yawn. You guys are not even interesting. Marry, get a job, become a man. You can’t remain a sophomoric Star Trek fan and postmodernist your entire friggin’ life. Star Trek and its entire paradigm, very pretentious Quine-style crap, is essentially about communists in their pajamas exploring outer space and spreading their weirdo bolshevist ideas to aliens who just wish they would stay away. Posted by Cleve Blakemore · March 2nd, 2005 at 11:47 pm [/quote][/quote]