|
by laudablepuss 01/14/2005, 1:11pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mister helper wrote:
laudablepuss wrote:
Chairman Mao wrote:
laudablepuss wrote:
So the Army defeated Japan? And the "giant" in that phrase refers to just them? Huh. And here, I thought they had some help. GO ARMY! NICE SWIMMING GUYS!
Well, ignoring for a second the fact that they were ignoring the Navy and Marines, back when the Army defeated Japan the Air Force that did 90% of the defeating was still the Army Air Corps.
The Army Air Corps defeated Japan? Or 90% of it? What about our subs sinking every merchant marine ship in the water? That probably accounted for 90% of the starvation. Or the Aviators who took out 90% of their Navy? I think you're 90% wrong here. As far as the "giant", I think the war effort was pretty universal and the millitary owed plenty to the private sector.
But who cares, the Army is ready to take credit to bolster their position for the faggotyest faggotry possible: threatening people over the internet. TERRIFYING.
You couldn't ignore for a second what Mao asked you to, thereby arguing against nothing but the voices in your head. This is why people think you're simple. Why can't you read the part the front of the newspaper as well as you do the back? Will you even understand that sentence? Probably not.
Goodbye.
Yep, I didn't understand the sentence. "the part the front" confused me. Did you mean "the front part"? Anyway, sarcasm is hard to read for lots of people, not just (but especially) me. Slate suggested a sarcasm punctuation point, but I think the suggestion might have been sarcastic. Don't take my word for it, obviously. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|