Forum Overview :: We Love Katamari
 
Remember the talk about the new Lara Croft being a creepy injury fetish? by fabio 02/26/2013, 12:06pm PST
Seems like they're duped every reviewer into the thinking man's sexism.


Tom Chick wrote:

The previous Lara Croft was perfectly expressed by casting Angelina Jolie for the Tomb Raider movies. Larger than life, iconic, aglow with celebrity, handy with pistols, plastically unreal.

The new Lara Croft is none of those thing. This Lara Croft is small and girlish, with a pony tail instead of the previous tightly pratical braid. She looks more likely to raid a library than a tomb (she even claims to hate tombs at one point). She’s smart and competent, but aware of her limitations. She expresses self-doubt, grief, confusion, anguish, and pain. She runs out of breath. She is not a superman. She is cold, wet, dirty, and sometimes wounded. Indiana Jones might get his knuckles scraped up before the scene is over, but he — and Nathan Drake, by the way — is defined by swagger and confidence. He has no self-doubt, only the grim resignation and acceptance that befits a stoically invulnerable character. See also, pre-Skyfall James Bond.


Nice try, Hollywood. Mr. Chick didn't fall for that Indiana Jones fad. If only the rest of the movie could capture the tone of Marion sobbing as she's about to have her face burned off by flaming liquor.


The rest of the article? Which actress should play her in the theoretical movie. The lowest of possible low video game topics.
REPLY QUOTE
 
Remember the talk about the new Lara Croft being a creepy injury fetish? by fabio 02/26/2013, 12:06pm PST NEW
 
powered by pointy