|
by The Happiness Engine 10/08/2013, 6:36pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Commander Tansin A. Darcos wrote:
No rational person of normal intelligence could seriously claim I have any of these conditions.
No, they could.
Commander Tansin A. Darcos wrote:
There are great examples of autism in film, going back to probably the first description of it with the little girl who can't respond to anything in the movie Change of Habit with Mary Tyler Moore and Elvis Presley back in the 1970s all the way through Rain Man with Dustin Hoffman. These are clear examples of autism, people with no sense of humor - not just a bad one or one you disagree with - but none at all, and very little ability to relate to the rest of the world.
No, like literally ever single thing put on screen, these are not accurate portrayals of the world around us, they are gripping narrative. You are arguing that W.O.P.R exists because Wargames was fun to watch. And I know you can't, but I'm sure are studio audience at home does not fail to miss that you are trying to argue a very narrow literal rule-based efinition of a word that people are using casually to mean "you are bad at social interaction." It's also the same reason that every 3rd post here is not someone misconstruing the person they are responding to as being homosexual.
Commander Tansin A. Darcos wrote:
Further more, any of you who noted my screaming outburst on The Don Rogers Show would know that a person with autism lacks the capacity to have that kind of response to others. They don't make remarks directed toward others, they tend to be inward.
Now this is just factually wrong, and hurtful, and dangerous if taken as advice. Autistic people are every bit as handy-CAPABLE as being emotionally frustrated as those evil Neuro-Typicals, and furthermore, I'd argue it happens easier IMHO as they can't adequately diffuse their frustration through discussion. This causes a period a simmering rage which ultimately explodes at a seemingly minor issue due to their inability to manage these feelings.
Like say, angrily flouncing off of message boards every now and again.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Caltrops is now the #1 reference for "cretinous reprobates" on Google by Commander Tansin A. Darcos 09/14/2013, 4:18pm PDT 
Yahoo and Bing don't have us at all. Proof that neither is worth using. NT by Commander Tansin A. Darcos 09/14/2013, 4:35pm PDT 
It's back to #2!! by Roop 09/29/2013, 5:46pm PDT 
Re: It's back to #2!! by Commander Tansin A. Darcos 10/07/2013, 10:00am PDT 
I'm curious as to what your definition of trolling is by Entropy Stew 10/07/2013, 11:08am PDT 
Re: I'm curious as to what your definition of trolling is by Commander Tansin A. Darcos 10/08/2013, 5:47pm PDT 
Re: I'm curious as to what your definition of trolling is by The Happiness Engine 10/08/2013, 6:36pm PDT 
Re: I'm curious as to what your definition of trolling is by Mysterio 10/08/2013, 7:19pm PDT 
Re: I'm curious as to what your definition of trolling is by Commander Tansin A. Darcos 10/09/2013, 8:40pm PDT 
Re: I'm curious as to what your definition of trolling is by Mysterio 10/09/2013, 11:18pm PDT 
Movies are not real life, Paul. You, on the other hand, you're the real deal by Eurotrash 10/09/2013, 2:50pm PDT 
Re: Movies are not real life, Paul. You, on the other hand, you're the real deal by Commander Tansin A. Darcos 10/09/2013, 8:16pm PDT 
Re: It's back to #2!! by Eurotrash 10/07/2013, 11:37pm PDT 
Now that's just cruel NT by Mysterioes Everywhere? 10/07/2013, 11:54pm PDT 
Anyway. Excellent work, Commander. It's back at #1 NT by Roop 10/08/2013, 8:33pm PDT 
And it's one of my posts that it links to. Hahahaha the irony NT by Eurotrash 10/09/2013, 12:02am PDT 
|
|