 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Re: How many hits per day? Let's all see just how much exposure Caltrops gets. by Ice Cream Jonsey 02/08/2014, 9:31am PST | ||||
 |
 |
|||
stupid rookie wrote: Sure: Jan, 2014: Visits: 7,588 Pages per visit: 8.77 Other years: Jan, 2009: Visits: 13,598 Jan, 2010: Visits: 16,779 Jan, 2011: Visits: 10,592 Jan, 2012: Visits: 10,260 Jan 2013: Visits: 9,630 So from this, I think it's pretty clear that despite our best efforts, the site is either dying or pissing people off to the point where they stop coming back. Which is not totally unreasonable. Virtually all of the posters from when we first started have moved on. This is a hard site to attract new people to. And yet, it seems like there's plenty of content, and the posts are good, I don't know. I guess there used to be more posts when Quentinbec was present? The biggest events in site history was the RPS link during the OMM Wikipedia fiasco, and Mischief Maker's top 100 indie games article, which is still in the top 20 of all visited pages each month. the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey! |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Fun stats, January 2014 by 02/07/2014, 11:04pm PST  How many hits per day? Let's all see just how much exposure Caltrops gets. by 02/07/2014, 11:15pm PST Re: How many hits per day? Let's all see just how much exposure Caltrops gets. by 02/08/2014, 9:31am PST I'm taking the last lifeboat and you can't do shit about it NT by 02/08/2014, 10:18am PST This idea is probably dumb but how would you feel about talking to p4rgaming by 02/08/2014, 11:35am PST less spineless than the typical shit found in the industry anyway. NT by 02/08/2014, 11:36am PST Re: How many hits per day? Let's all see just how much exposure Caltrops gets. by 04/03/2014, 5:06am PDT It's fun to see you again. I hope you stay with us. NT by 04/04/2014, 7:35am PDT So really icycalm's insecurity is the majority of our clickthroughs? NT by 02/07/2014, 11:16pm PST |
