 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| So about the economy, would you prefer if it was gone completely or monolithic? by stupid rookie 02/08/2014, 11:47am PST | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| Monolithic meaning there's one big supersystem like a tech tree - an economic development tree, or something - that denoted development in your core worlds, and maybe another one in your frontiers or you managed a few colonies independently or something.
Instead of a thousand system/planet screens, you have a viceroy for that shit that you order to ramp up logistics by dumping money into a space superhighway thing (stargates, whatever) and get some new strategic benefit (insta-move a fleet like Hivers, faster movement in your territory, not sure). You still get to play around with getting colonies off the ground, unless your development minister is in charge of applying a program you design to every colony until it's ready to join the core. Would you want that or would you rather the economy was torn out/made as simple as possible? |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
It still blows. by 12/09/2012, 10:23am PST  Update: IT STILL BLOWS by 02/08/2014, 8:18am PST So about the economy, would you prefer if it was gone completely or monolithic? by 02/08/2014, 11:47am PST SOTS2 is structurally unsound, there's nothing worth saving by 02/08/2014, 11:59am PST Ask Wittgenstien a question about economy in 4xes, get response about SOTS2 by 02/08/2014, 1:47pm PST OH HELLO, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS FORUM OR THE ORIGINAL POST WAS ABOUT NT by 02/08/2014, 2:15pm PST I CAN'T TOLERATE CHANGING THE SUBJECT WITHOUT DEPLOYING CAPSLOCK by 02/08/2014, 4:05pm PST |
