 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| I want Gawker to burn by Glen from Habbo 10/26/2014, 6:13pm PDT | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| I want to see Gawker die. I will detail all their hipocrasy in this thread. Everyone working there is a sub-human piece of shit.
First up. We all know about how they are losing money because advertisers are pulling out. That's great. Couldn't happen to a nicer group of assholes. What you will now see is the cretins at Gawker try to get views by running articles about pieces of shit bigger than them. They've already started. I won't link anything but each article will be recent. The one I love right now is the one about the guy who encountered cops that threatened to kill his dog. We all hate cops that try to kill DOGS right? You'll see articles where the victims are kids, pets and the handicapped. People that everyone has sympathy for. This is their tactic. |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
I want Gawker to burn by 10/26/2014, 6:13pm PDT  Oh, and by 10/26/2014, 6:16pm PDT killing dogs as opposed to blacks and the mentally ill? NT by 10/26/2014, 7:33pm PDT gawkr only succeeds because the public buys what they're selling by 10/26/2014, 8:00pm PDT Re: gawkr only succeeds because the public buys what they're selling by 10/26/2014, 9:17pm PDT You're really overthinking it by 10/27/2014, 2:40pm PDT Counterpoint: I like Gawker, I think they are good NT by 10/26/2014, 9:37pm PDT Protip: To assist with credibility spell words correctly. by 10/27/2014, 6:09am PDT That is the correct spelling where I am from. NT by 10/27/2014, 5:17pm PDT Wait, like the building to burn? With people inside? You sick f NT by 10/27/2014, 12:43pm PDT Gawker is burning by 11/13/2014, 11:02am PST Gawker condemning the internet for phoney outrage articles NT by 11/13/2014, 10:07pm PST |
