Forum Overview :: Magic: The Gathering and Monopoly
 
Rozalski's stuff, from a 1 minute look, is not nearly as cool IMO by Fullofkittens 05/10/2018, 5:50pm PDT
A: it's not nearly as beautiful and B: part of what makes Stålenhag's stuff interesting is that his paintings all imply some kind of history. You have a vaguely futuristic station wagon parked by the side of the road and some tourists are taking pictures of a decades-old wreck of a gigantic spaceship in a mountain range. It's like a travelogue to a lived-in scifi setting. (And it looks awesome).

Rozalki's stuff is all like "Ok, DM rolls 1d20 and..." *checks table* "...you see a battlemech. And..." *rolls 1d20 again* "...a nazi barbarian." Not as intriguing. And again it doesn't look nearly as good. I don't know enough about art to comment about why that is.
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Scythe by fabio 09/13/2017, 12:45pm PDT NEW
    I found the artwork too static by skip 05/09/2018, 8:34am PDT NEW
        tangent: Simon Stålenhag's art is cool though. NT by Fullofkittens 05/09/2018, 9:35am PDT NEW
            tangent part 2: I honestly thought Simon Stålenhag's did the game by mark 05/09/2018, 11:45am PDT NEW
                Rozalski's stuff, from a 1 minute look, is not nearly as cool IMO by Fullofkittens 05/10/2018, 5:50pm PDT NEW
    I just didn't really feel this one by mark 05/09/2018, 11:43am PDT NEW
    A digital version just dropped on GOG. by Mischief Maker 07/08/2020, 8:15am PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy