 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| re: Taylor Swift and Foo Fighters, it's kind of understandable...? by Fullofkittens 12/27/2018, 10:14am PST | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| From their perspective they want to get out in front of these kinds of controversies, they'd rather be upfront about it and say "Listen, these are the terms. We do not want to hear from your lawyer," than re-litigate this thing over and over ad infinitum. There's some ambiguity re: who owns what when I take a picture of you without either of us signing anything. Those contracts remove that ambiguity.
The fact that they do it in a way that is very favorable to the artists is a reflection of the imbalance in who stands to gain from that relationship. Dave Grohl gets jack shit when you take a picture of him, he's already maximum famous. You could make a bunch of money off a picture of him or raise your professional profile, should he just let you do it? (I guess I sort of pictured Dave Grohl as the kind of guy that would just let you do it, but apparently not.) |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Arch Enemy - too stupid to understand how basic copyright works by 12/26/2018, 2:46pm PST  Apparently the lead singer has a Anarachy & Equality patch on her jacket. Haha NT by 12/27/2018, 5:50am PST Right? by 12/27/2018, 9:29am PST re: Taylor Swift and Foo Fighters, it's kind of understandable...? by 12/27/2018, 10:14am PST Re: re: Taylor Swift and Foo Fighters, it's kind of understandable...? by 12/27/2018, 10:33am PST They also deleted all comments calling them out on it. by 12/27/2018, 9:38am PST "I'm too stupid to realize when I'm talking to a bands manager not some fly NT by 12/27/2018, 1:35pm PST It's so unlike an anon to take the band's side. NT by 12/27/2018, 1:56pm PST Speaking of retards, see the lead singer's response... by 12/27/2018, 2:02pm PST Thunderball Clothing shut down & Arch Enemy is still attacking the photographer by 01/07/2019, 1:20am PST The photographer pointed out in an interview that they have done this before... by 01/07/2019, 1:30am PST |
