|
|
Forum Overview
::
Rants
|
|
|
by Bananadine 01/02/2003, 12:22pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senor Barborito wrote:
Length: went fine for me. Movie moves fast. Drop some of the crap, though, and add a three-minute sequence of Sam and Frodo stumbling/toiling over 5-6 completely different terrains, with 'wearying travel' music on so that the audience really gets a sense of the achingly long travel time involved here - the entire story is supposed to take *8 FUCKING YEARS*, folks.
With you on this--there's more trouble with the length and arrangement of scenes than there is with the movie's overall length. As one of those guys who would be willing to sit through a truly complete recreation of the books (in, say, five six-hour shifts), I am glad to recommend the Fellowship of the Ring Special Extended Edition DVD set, which extends things by a much more manageable half-hour or so. It's still a damn long movie to sit through, but if you didn't think the first one was too long and you've got thirty bucks to blow it's definitely worth a look. Presumably they'll be doing the same with the other two movies.
By the way, I'm not a huge fanboy. I'm just really good at sitting in a chair and looking at something. :(
Ents. Ents were a huge fucking letdown. WETA took the obvious route here and compared to every other visual in the movie the ents just look terrible and, if you're a modeler of any kind, horribly fucking cliched. I was nearly in tears. I'm not sure what I was looking for, but I know that's not it - I had pretty much the same weak specifications for the appearance of the Balrog, and on that score WETA came through. It was NOT a cheesy fire-demon. The Ents were cheesy with a capital C.
And judging these characters on a less visual level, I ended up with preferences just opposite to yours. I love ents, and what I love about them was represented well in the movie: They have a perspective on the world that is charmingly alien to that of the story's heroes, and they're FIGHTING TREES. When Pippin said something stupid to Treebeard and Treebeard replied with "That doesn't make much sense to me, but then again, you're very small," it came across as something other than slapstick-level humor for once, because it fit his character. There could have been more showing of ents and they could have looked better, but I liked them.
Also: Hurons? Where the fuck where the Hurons? Weren't they supposed to eat some huge fucking army at some point?
Dunno whether my long-faded memory of a thorough reading is a match for your pre-cybernetic recollection of a skimming, but I think it's huorns, and I think they would have been too much for the movie to explain, given the short time it devoted to the ents at all.
No Elijah Wood in your orgy list? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
So, anyway, like I was saying (LOTR sux0rz) by laudablepuss 12/23/2002, 5:16pm PST 
Re: So, anyway, like I was saying (LOTR sux0rz) by mrs. johnson 12/23/2002, 6:00pm PST 
Re: So, anyway, like I was saying (LOTR sux0rz) by laudablepuss, aka "mysterio" (heh) 12/23/2002, 6:24pm PST 
Re: So, anyway, like I was saying (LOTR sux0rz) by mrs. johnson 12/23/2002, 6:01pm PST 
Sorry about that, I got lots of weird errors, and the first post didn't show up. n/T NT by mrs. johnson 12/23/2002, 6:01pm PST 
Stop, just...stop. You only make me yearn for Tatters. by CrackerBarrel 12/24/2002, 9:04pm PST 
Re: Stop, just...stop. You only make me yearn for Tatters. by laudablepuss 12/31/2002, 7:00pm PST 
My planethate response to your planethate post by FABIO 01/01/2003, 6:04am PST 
What I thought was my argument-ending reply on Planet Hate... by ToutSuite 01/01/2003, 1:36pm PST 
Re: What I thought was my argument-ending reply on Planet Hate... by Zseni 01/01/2003, 2:13pm PST 
Re: What I thought was my argument-ending reply on Planet Hate... by TAFKAM 01/06/2003, 2:15pm PST 
my thoughts (spoilers duh) by veronica 01/01/2003, 2:49pm PST 
Re: my thoughts (spoilers duh) by laudablepuss 01/02/2003, 1:22pm PST 
Re: my thoughts (spoilers duh) by ToutSuite 01/02/2003, 4:36pm PST 
Re: my thoughts (spoilers duh) by mrs. johnson 01/02/2003, 5:05pm PST 
Movies suck now. by Fussbett 01/02/2003, 6:02pm PST 
Re: Movies suck now. NT by Pasty guys with dreads are fags n/T 01/03/2003, 9:07pm PST 
Reason for Liv Tyler's scene by Mischief Maker 01/01/2003, 10:58pm PST 
Well by Senor Barborito 01/02/2003, 6:10am PST 
Re: Well by Bananadine 01/02/2003, 12:22pm PST 
My take by ToutSuite 01/02/2003, 9:35am PST 
Re: My take by Senor Barborito 01/02/2003, 10:42am PST 
Re: My take by laudablepuss 01/02/2003, 1:42pm PST 
Re: My take by junior allen 01/02/2003, 2:17pm PST 
Re: My take by laudablepuss 01/02/2003, 2:55pm PST 
Re: My take by mrs. johnson 01/02/2003, 5:01pm PST 
Re: My take by Bodybag 01/02/2003, 6:43pm PST 
Re: My take by ToutSuite 01/02/2003, 7:47pm PST 
Re: My take by Bodybag 01/02/2003, 8:55pm PST 
Re: My take by Bill Dungsroman, HSW 01/03/2003, 11:42am PST 
BG in Gangs of New York. by Fussbett 01/02/2003, 8:06pm PST 
Also: SPOILERS(NT) by Bodybag 01/02/2003, 8:51pm PST 
It's not a spoiler. by Fussbett 01/02/2003, 9:05pm PST 
We can't take the risk. ES, delete! by Ray, of Light 01/02/2003, 10:58pm PST 
I CANT READ THIS THREAD. HAVE NOT SEEN MOVIE YET -nt- by Entropy Stew 01/03/2003, 11:29pm PST 
Re: My take by Chairman Nematode 01/03/2003, 12:04am PST 
Re: What I thought was my argument-ending reply on Planet Hate... by Ice Cream Jonsey 01/02/2003, 3:08pm PST 
One big improvement of TTT over FOTR by Mischief Maker 01/05/2003, 5:41pm PST 
Suspension of belief ay? n/T NT by mrs. johnson 01/05/2003, 6:05pm PST 
Fucking Canadians NT by Mischief Moose 01/06/2003, 1:50pm PST 
|
|
|
|
|