The idea that "the computer will disappear" is probably accurate in the long term. Except for content delivery (reading, photos, movies), most tasks we achieve via computers and phones do not strictly require a screen.

The 5 senses thing is long-disproven rubbish. Humans have hundreds of senses.

This strikes me as a less-functional Apple Watch that you wear on your shirt instead of your wrist.
(Yes, Siri is not great today, but that will change very quickly with Apple working hard on their own LLMs.)

Genuinely asking, problem does this solve?

> Photography was not allowed during WIRED’s visit to Humane, and the company didn’t provide WIRED a Pin to try.
Clearly very confident in their product.

DOA.
- too stealable, by people who will not care that a subscription is needed.

- the act of theft will happen violently and close up, not fun.

- it's an easy smallish act of violence, which means the on-ramp to violence is also easy. Not something most people want to invite into their lives.

- "they" (the Committee) will say phones can also be grabbed. But the equation here is different. With a phone there's no hand on your chest, no tearing of clothing, and for a phone thieves know you will try harder to get it back. With this, after the violent taking, the shock value and the relative disposability of the device will stop most from chasing the thief. This will be known subconsciously if not outright, so the "phones are also easy to grab" comparison does not apply.