Forum Overview :: Motherfucking News
 
Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 6:16pm PST
Tribes used real multi-texturing back in the day - actually adding each bullethole to the texture IN RAM and then retransmitting the texture across the AGP pipe. Took them months with nVidia to get the game remotely playable on TNTs.

Everquest in the early days had no parametric events, so every time you're in the faggy elf city and there are people riding up the elevator to the treetop forest, the elevator has to retransmit its coordinates with each new world update - prediction was only for players.

It was kind of funny watching the elevator, just by itself, stuttering up and down as each new world-positional coordinate was transmitted. Even funnier was watching it literally HOP several feet each few frames if, say, 30 players got on it at once.

The guys at 989 bragged in interview after interview about how great their netcode was, too - I read with anticipation, and when I saw that behavior I started laughing because I had started reading up on parametric events at age 17. Not as bad a fuckup as Anarchy Online's self-DDoS when they communicated all game traffic in TCP/IP - the ACKs drowning out the server and causing more traffic to be lost resulting in a constant downward spiral. They'd fire up the server again and for 5 minutes it'd be OK until WHAM and again and again . . .

Maybe it's too easy to criticize because I've never written netcode but how can people *WHO ARE GETTING PAID* not know to a) use UDP, b) use Asynchronous Sockets for your client and Overlapped I/O for your server, and c) minimize amount of information sent where possible?

You would think that MMORPG programmers would understand that netcode is MORE IMPORTANT than graphics for their product, and that most of the physics/AI energies of a 'normal' game can be transferred to it - but in many products there is little evidence of this happening and to some extent the opposite. [/rant]

--SB
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Carmack's 'rocket' by Senor Barborito 02/05/2003, 5:41am PST NEW
    Re: Carmack's 'rocket' by Mischief Maker 02/05/2003, 11:58am PST NEW
    Sheesh by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 12:01am PST NEW
        Re: Sheesh by Cyrris 02/09/2003, 1:26am PST NEW
            That's telling me by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 2:11am PST NEW
        Well by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 6:06am PST NEW
    I don't get it! by Fussbett 02/09/2003, 1:11am PST NEW
        He's jealous. Duh. -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 02/09/2003, 3:22am PST NEW
        I'm not much of a programmer by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 4:58am PST NEW
            You're not much of anything by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 5:32am PST NEW
                Re: You're not much of anything by Zebco Fuckface 02/09/2003, 5:47am PST NEW
                    Re: You're not much of anything by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 6:29am PST NEW
                That's better than being unable to read by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 5:49am PST NEW
                    Also question for the moron by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 5:56am PST NEW
                        Oh, stop with the pretending you know math, already. by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 6:32am PST NEW
                    "You can't read." Brilliant. by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 6:28am PST NEW
                        Better than anything you've posted to the site, at least by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 12:43pm PST NEW
                            Holy crap, it just occurred to me. by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 2:31pm PST NEW
                                PS: by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 2:49pm PST NEW
                                    Hahahaha by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 3:18pm PST NEW
                                Thank you for proving my point. by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 3:17pm PST NEW
                                Tsk tsk, and you were almost making sense up until that point by Entropy Stew 02/09/2003, 4:55pm PST NEW
                                    You're both right and wrong. by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 5:45pm PST NEW
                                        Carmack: History's rocketeer or programmer? by Fussbett 02/09/2003, 6:08pm PST NEW
                                            Presumably by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 6:18pm PST NEW
                                        Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 6:16pm PST NEW
                                            Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Zebco Fuckface 02/09/2003, 7:10pm PST NEW
                                            Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Zebco Fuckface 02/09/2003, 7:13pm PST NEW
                                                Hell by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 8:51pm PST NEW
                                                    Also by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 8:58pm PST NEW
                                                        Hold up by mark 02/09/2003, 9:19pm PST NEW
                                                    Re: Hell by Zebco Fuckface 02/09/2003, 11:48pm PST NEW
                                                        Re: Hell by Senor Barborito 02/10/2003, 12:07am PST NEW
                                                            Re: Hell by Zebco Fuckface 02/11/2003, 7:08am PST NEW
                                            Lot of network talk over the past few days .. by bastage 02/09/2003, 7:48pm PST NEW
                                                Re: Lot of network talk over the past few days .. by Lufteufel 02/09/2003, 10:07pm PST NEW
                                                    Quake 1: 250-350ms ping over modem. Those were the days n/t NT by <-Nordic-> 02/11/2003, 9:48pm PST NEW
                                            Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by mark 02/09/2003, 9:43pm PST NEW
                                                Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 9:59pm PST NEW
                                                oops, should have read this first re: carmack [nt] NT by Lufteufel 02/09/2003, 10:08pm PST NEW
                                            Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Mysterio 11/23/2013, 6:46am PST NEW
                                                Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by col.schickn 11/23/2013, 8:38am PST NEW
                                        This post should be stickied forever by This is what futurists actually bel 08/07/2017, 10:55am PDT NEW
                                            Long bets, and the futurists that love them NT by Voxels vs V-2s 08/07/2017, 3:00pm PDT NEW
                                            Rocket, stealing porn goggle tech, Futurism isn't an 'exact' science. NT by The Happiness Engine 08/08/2017, 6:26pm PDT NEW
                                    Yeah, exactly. by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 8:57pm PST NEW
                        A quick literature search by mark 02/09/2003, 1:26pm PST NEW
                            Thank you - this was exactly my point by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 1:49pm PST NEW
                    Re: That's better than being unable to read by Fat Autistic Fuck 06/11/2022, 12:27pm PDT NEW
            Re: I'm not much of a programmer by Zebco Fuckface 02/09/2003, 5:46am PST NEW
                Yeah, me too!! by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 6:19am PST NEW
            Re: I'm not much of a programmer by fanclub 02/10/2003, 4:36pm PST NEW
                You're right by Senor Barborito 02/10/2003, 4:45pm PST NEW
                    But I thought you wanted to weed out the imperfect... -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 02/11/2003, 1:28am PST NEW
    This whole thing. Bump. NT by Mysterio 11/22/2013, 4:57pm PST NEW
        I was going to snicker at the prediction of Doom 3 revolutionizing the industry by Lemoney Snick 11/22/2013, 7:55pm PST NEW
            Look, the technology was ready, but he was afraid he'd open a portal to hell by blackwater 11/22/2013, 10:20pm PST NEW
 
powered by pointy