 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| I had a long-term plan for a monthly CV chat. But... by Zseni 02/22/2003, 2:17pm PST | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| 1. That's a ways out from now, it comes after there's an actual CV site, and that comes after an actual CV audience. For those playing along at home, my present standard for CV audience is 15-20 posts a day on a fairly regular basis. Furthermore it's only once a month, and for that purpose I can just set up a room on any old server. The purpose would be to have a live competition on some short form like haiku or epitaph, with sko needlessly token prize for the victor.
2. A Caltrops chat would be highly, highly, highly gay. I am not opposed to one, but I am not decidedly for one either. I think if there is a chat it should be a) not 24/7, b) unmoderated, and c) primarily for the purpose of organizing CS/C&C/whatever the fuck else game groups. There just isn't the readership here to justify an ongoing chat - in the same way that there isn't the readership to justify my building a whole new site just for CV yet. 3. The Cool Kids already use AIM for most of the site-related off-site chatter; why bother with IRC when anyone interested can get an AIM account and set up individual or group chats as they please? [BTW, I'm at zsenijeim@aim.] |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Regretably by 02/22/2003, 1:01am PST  There is no Caltrops IRC by 02/22/2003, 1:04am PST Re: There is no Caltrops IRC by 02/22/2003, 1:10am PST IRC daemon? by 02/22/2003, 1:23am PST I'd really rather not, but I'd do it if ES wanted to. NT by 02/22/2003, 2:10am PST I'm ambivalent. How many of you fags would want IRC, anyhow? -nt- NT by 02/22/2003, 3:53am PST Occasional IRC? Maybe. by 02/22/2003, 5:22am PST It would make this place gayer. I'm for it -nt- NT by 02/22/2003, 1:32pm PST Nay. Same reasons as the gnome. -nt- NT by 02/22/2003, 1:39pm PST I had a long-term plan for a monthly CV chat. But... by 02/22/2003, 2:17pm PST Agreed by 02/22/2003, 2:28pm PST |
