Forum Overview :: Operation: Hammer Time
 
Huh? by Beast-God 04/10/2003, 12:39pm PDT
Jr.Walker wrote:

Ray, of Light wrote:

Mr Smoke wrote:

Or not?


The Brits are floating a regime-change trial balloon.

Ray!
Re: Darwin/Anti-Darwin

Help me out with this one. I once read an article on how viciously the scientific community will rip your name and work if you so much as criticize the established Darwin/Evolution timeline.


What do you mean by "Darwin/Evolution timeline"? Do you mean coming up with data that sez certain fossils of extinct animals have been found from different epochs than they're assumed to be in? Do you mean positive proof that Evolution is wrong? I'll need specifics on what the exact argument is that would cause the scientific community to tar and feather you for me to give a decent explanation/link. I'm inclined to think the argument in question is sko "AHA! WE HAVEN'T FOUND THE LINK BETWEEN THE LAND ANCESTOR AND WHALES! EVOLUTION IS A HOAX!!!"

Fuck creationism, not about that (haha) debate. This is about how when Darwin fails you are not allowed to discuss it. Carbon dating data has been tossed or disregarded when it conflicts with prevailing thought and heads of universities and even editors of scientific journals have lost jobs claiming that there are huge holes of logic in Darwinism.


Well what do you mean by "Darwinism?" The theory of evolution? What are examples of Darwinism failing? New species appearing spontaneously from no pre-existing anscestor? Who are these journal editors and university heads losing their jobs over this? There's plenty of hearty debate over the mechanism by which evolution occurs. But where does "Darwinism" fail?

If a scientist did discover conclusive proof that the theory of evolution is wrong, they'd win the nobel prize and become rich and famous; probably immortalized in scientific literature from this day on. If there is proof that darwinism "fails" scientists would be scrambling to be the first to shout it from the rooftops rather than saying "No no! We can't discuss this!"
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Terror no more? by Mr Smoke 04/09/2003, 5:08pm PDT NEW
    Fear not by Ray, of Light 04/10/2003, 1:14am PDT NEW
        Re: Fear not by Jr.Walker 04/10/2003, 9:46am PDT NEW
            Huh? by Beast-God 04/10/2003, 12:39pm PDT NEW
            Re: Fear not by Link Lord 04/10/2003, 1:17pm PDT NEW
            The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by Chemdem 04/10/2003, 2:19pm PDT NEW
                Re: The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by t0ny 04/10/2003, 2:50pm PDT NEW
                    Re: The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by Jr.Walker 04/11/2003, 2:51am PDT NEW
                        Re: The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by foogla 04/11/2003, 5:15am PDT NEW
                            Re: The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by Jr.Walker 04/11/2003, 9:50am PDT NEW
                                Terry Pratchett - Strata (that was 20 years ago, might be called something else) NT by foogla 04/11/2003, 10:43am PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy