 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| If lying liberals are forced to report this then it must not be a lie by The Joosh 07/21/2004, 3:45am PDT | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| A-16: Even cynical New York Times-bashers must be amazed that that is where the paper ran the news of the Sandy Berger criminal investigation. I guess they wouldn't want to bump that late-breaking piece on untucked shirttails from the front page.
I'm willing to believe that Sandy Berger had no nefarious motives when he walked out of a secure reading room with "highly classified terrorism documents and handwritten notes" on the Clinton administration's handling of al Qaeda threats, as the A.P. is reporting. But could we please hear a little less about how the Bush administration's foreign policy advisers are incompetent? This guy was National Security Adviser. Yikes. Yikes, indeed. The other possibility, of course, is that Berger was removing the documents because they contained information that might hurt his reputation, or President Clinton's, or perhaps John Kerry's. |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
If lying liberals are forced to report this then it must not be a lie by 07/21/2004, 3:45am PDT  Furthermore, I am told that an FBI agent described Berger as "a total asshole" by 07/21/2004, 3:52am PDT The pablum puked by the liberal MEDIA!!!!! cannot be measured by a yardsDICK NT by 07/21/2004, 3:59am PDT Re: If lying liberals are forced to report this then it must not be a lie by 07/22/2004, 6:51pm PDT |
