|
by FABIO 05/10/2003, 12:06pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Rightbug wrote:
The acting was great, it was well filmed and, as for the nature of the major twist, it kept me guessing. I kept trying to figure it out and came close but never managed to get it all the way.
You couldn't figure it out? Halfway through it, before they showed John Cusak tied up at the appeal hearing, we were thinking "wait a minute, multiple personalities, hallucinations, this all better not turn out to be all in the killer's head". Everyone having the same birthday as the killer sealed that theory.
Also, maybe not reading or seeing Ten Little Indians would have kept me guessing instead of immediately knowing that the killer was someone who everyone thought was dead. That would narrow it down to the rainman father, the Vegas husband, or...the kid! And which was the only one that was unaccounted for at each of the murders? Why was the fact that the kid went into his mother's room all alone right before she died made in to such a big deal? "Jesus, please tell me the kid's not going to turn out to be the killer".
Third "don't tell me" moment, when the young wife picked up the burial ground brochure at the beginning, "Jesus, don't tell me this Motel was built on an indian burial ground".
Also also, if you're going to base a story off of a previous one, DON'T have the characters mention that this seems straight out of said story. Unless your movie isn't trying to be serious in the first place (Scream, Jason X), it kills suspension of disbelief. It's as if the writers sensed that we'd call them out on it and slipped in a line to say "Yeah we know it's just like Ten Little Indians....but WITH A TWISTTM!".
As for the None Of It Was Real! "copout" I was glad that it wasn't happening in reality because there would have been way too many plot holes and rediculous coincidences if it was.
Which is exactly why it's the ending chosen when one is unable to work out the loose ends of and conclude a story. What's your definition of copout?
As for the final twist, it was poorly done but at least we didn't end up with a happy crappy ending with her working a citrus farm the rest of her days.
Instead we were presented with a 6 year old kid that somehow was able to overpower and kill grown men who were not taken by surprise and rig up a car bomb. Oh wait, IT WAS ALL A DREAM! No explanation needed! |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
movie review: Identity by FABIO 05/10/2003, 1:02am PDT 
agreed. also SPOILERS. by ydrt 05/10/2003, 6:41am PDT 
Re: agreed. also SPOILERS. (And yes, more spoilers) by Rightbug 05/10/2003, 11:38am PDT 
Re: agreed. also SPOILERS. (And yes, more spoilers) by FABIO 05/10/2003, 12:06pm PDT 
Re: agreed. also SPOILERS. (And yes, more spoilers) by Rightbug 05/11/2003, 3:02pm PDT 
ok, how's this then? by FABIO 05/12/2003, 12:59am PDT 
oops by FABIO 05/12/2003, 1:08am PDT 
fucking typos, I give up NT by FABIO 05/12/2003, 1:09am PDT 
Re: oops by Rightbug 05/12/2003, 5:28pm PDT 
I am no porm, you faggot. NT by Oscar Wilde 05/13/2003, 1:02am PDT 
Re: oops by FABIO 05/13/2003, 1:26am PDT 
Same game, different baby by Entropy Stew 05/13/2003, 1:46am PDT 
Silent Hill 3 teaser by Fussbett 05/13/2003, 3:25am PDT 
Silent Hill 3 worries by FABIO 05/13/2003, 7:56am PDT 
Spoilers, plus a Vanilla Sky and Newhart TV show spoiler. by Fussbett 05/10/2003, 12:25pm PDT 
Vanilla Sky should have ended just as the Beach Boys swelled. NT by creativepig 05/10/2003, 12:29pm PDT 
I know Brian Wilson got a little hefty there but that's just cold. NT by K. Thor Jensen 05/11/2003, 1:59pm PDT 
Vanilla Sky was far less of a movie than Abre Los Ojos... by Lizard_King 05/10/2003, 2:48pm PDT 
Re: Vanilla Sky was far less of a movie than Abre Los Ojos... by foogla 05/10/2003, 3:30pm PDT 
|
|