Forum Overview :: Rants
 
You've got it backwards by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 8:55pm PDT
I need clarification wrote:

As I am apparently the poster boy for not getting banned (as well as the MDA), I'm beginning to wonder who is trolling whom here. SB has clearly been itching for a fight with GA since the day he "triumphantly quit" the chat room forever (kudos to the script writer of that post), and it's finally here. I guess. But I sincerely doubt this was a coordinated attack, and more of a "Holy shit! Look how much fun this is!" Creex kind of ban-a-thon.

I also wonder if SB's true motivation for starting Caltrops was to try and get some #GA people over here so he could ban them.


Part of my motivation was to ditch the individuals on the channel responsible for spamming forever and never have to put up with their personal abuse again. I'll even put up with it here if they're so goddamned obsessed with torturing me, but I won't take it in a spam format.

I honestly just never wanted to have anything to with that channel again, ever, and have never hear from any of the people I left behind who weren't also in #gay with me and V - Stepto and only Stepto excluded and only on personal IM. I made it a point to stay as uninvolved as I could, etc., and keep out of it and leave them the fuck alone. I don't mind the original Steve Lollerson posting his political beliefs in opposition to mine, but I mind him breaking the first rule of GA in here, and I really mind the others posting a shitload of spam here.

I was honestly and truly DYING to keep this from happening because I know what these fuckers are like - they will NEVER. STOP. HOUNDING. YOU. Eventually, I know already, it's going to start again and I'm going to end up banning a good portion of the open proxies on the Internet before it's over because I know exactly what they're like with anybody they've targeted. I want those who have been banned gone and out of my life for good no matter what it takes, but only if there is a legitimate means of doing it - I'm not allowed to 'cheat' and just ban people I don't like or they've won. If I banned you because I was sick of your bullshit, you've won.

I see all conversation, all dialogue, as a Darwinian process and the first person who gives up and refuses to engage on legitimate terms any further is the one who lost. I will not be that person in this situation, and I must play by the rules or I have to commit suicide because I have invalidated myself entirely.

The abuse wasn't the reason for yesterday's bans. I only ban when I have a legitimate reason no matter how much I hate somebody and you of all people ought to know that.

--SB
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Months of working #GA mentions into his posts finally pays off for SB by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 8:37pm PDT NEW
    You've got it backwards by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 8:55pm PDT NEW
        Oh, okay. That's totally sane. by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 9:02pm PDT NEW
            No. Not that simple. by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 9:14pm PDT NEW
                Re: No. Not that simple. by Derek Lollerson, PhD 06/05/2003, 11:52pm PDT NEW
                So scary. by Fussbett 06/06/2003, 1:34am PDT NEW
                Re: No. Not that simple. by Noam Lollamsky 06/07/2003, 1:26am PDT NEW
                    Goddamn by I need clarification 06/07/2003, 1:30am PDT NEW
            Are you *genuinely*questioning his sanity? by Peanut Gallery Gasps 06/05/2003, 9:15pm PDT NEW
                I like it. NT by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 9:19pm PDT NEW
            No, it's not by Stever Lollerson, Attorney At Law 06/06/2003, 11:20am PDT NEW
                well that's another proxy banned by Stever Lollerson, ExAttorney At Law 06/06/2003, 11:51am PDT NEW
                The truth by Derek Lollerson, PhD 06/07/2003, 10:20pm PDT NEW
                    you might want to start using your real nick NT by foogla 06/08/2003, 4:45am PDT NEW
                        I quite like this nick, besides it doesn't take a genius to figure out who's who NT by Derek Lollerson, PhD 06/08/2003, 6:29am PDT NEW
                            Re: I quite like this nick, besides it doesn't take a genius to figure out who's who by foogla 06/08/2003, 7:11am PDT NEW
                                THIS SUBTHREAD REPOSTED TO FOR EMPHASIS by Victor Davis Lollerson 06/08/2003, 11:53am PDT NEW
                                    Two guys acting like they're the same person... how very childish! by Roop Dirump 06/08/2003, 4:39pm PDT NEW
    SB to GA: OMG LOOK HOW MUCH FUN IT IS TO BAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by Jhoh Creexul 06/06/2003, 12:55am PDT NEW
    he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by Chet Lollerson 06/06/2003, 11:18am PDT NEW
        Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by FoK 06/06/2003, 11:38am PDT NEW
            note to self: use fresher, edgier Flash animation humor NT by Stever Lollerson, ExAttorney At Law 06/06/2003, 11:57am PDT NEW
            Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by Random Lurker 06/06/2003, 12:41pm PDT NEW
                Here we go again. by Fullofkittens 06/06/2003, 12:54pm PDT NEW
                    Yeah, I know you guys do (got some email, etc.). Don't sweat it. NT by Senor Barborito 06/06/2003, 1:16pm PDT NEW
                    Re: Here we go again. by Joshua Michael Lollerson 06/07/2003, 1:49am PDT NEW
                    Re: Here we go again. by Steve Kittens 06/07/2003, 2:37am PDT NEW
                        On defending yourself. by No Pocky For Kitty 06/08/2003, 9:34am PDT NEW
            Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by wide hurt 06/06/2003, 1:35pm PDT NEW
        Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by Stryker 06/06/2003, 12:56pm PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy