|
by Chet Lollerson 06/06/2003, 11:18am PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
I need clarification wrote:
But I sincerely doubt this was a coordinated attack, and more of a "Holy shit! Look how much fun this is!" Creex kind of ban-a-thon.
I suspect that that's a lot closer to the truth. Actually, in his lovably insane sort of way (i.e. suicide pact etc.) Barborito has even taken this all surprisingly well. My only quibble was with the bullshit SPAM SPAM RULE ONE LALA LOOK OVER HERE justification for deleting the initial posts, but he hasn't deleted any since being called on it, and many of the recent posts have been way more trollerific than the first posts were. And it should be noted that he is acting relatively sane in comparison to, say, HSW.
Seriously: when the hell did HSW/BDR get poured an extra heaping bowl of the crazyflakes? Was it when he realized that the Derek Lollerson satirical post was way funnier then anything he's contributed to this Web site (LOL THE RING GOES ON THE *MIDDLE FINGER* GET IT!? LOLOLOL *SNORT*)? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Months of working #GA mentions into his posts finally pays off for SB by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 8:37pm PDT 
You've got it backwards by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 8:55pm PDT 
Oh, okay. That's totally sane. by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 9:02pm PDT 
No. Not that simple. by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 9:14pm PDT 
Re: No. Not that simple. by Derek Lollerson, PhD 06/05/2003, 11:52pm PDT 
So scary. by Fussbett 06/06/2003, 1:34am PDT 
Re: No. Not that simple. by Noam Lollamsky 06/07/2003, 1:26am PDT 
Goddamn by I need clarification 06/07/2003, 1:30am PDT 
Are you *genuinely*questioning his sanity? by Peanut Gallery Gasps 06/05/2003, 9:15pm PDT 
I like it. NT by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 9:19pm PDT 
No, it's not by Stever Lollerson, Attorney At Law 06/06/2003, 11:20am PDT 
well that's another proxy banned by Stever Lollerson, ExAttorney At Law 06/06/2003, 11:51am PDT 
The truth by Derek Lollerson, PhD 06/07/2003, 10:20pm PDT 
you might want to start using your real nick NT by foogla 06/08/2003, 4:45am PDT 
I quite like this nick, besides it doesn't take a genius to figure out who's who NT by Derek Lollerson, PhD 06/08/2003, 6:29am PDT 
Re: I quite like this nick, besides it doesn't take a genius to figure out who's who by foogla 06/08/2003, 7:11am PDT 
THIS SUBTHREAD REPOSTED TO FOR EMPHASIS by Victor Davis Lollerson 06/08/2003, 11:53am PDT 
Two guys acting like they're the same person... how very childish! by Roop Dirump 06/08/2003, 4:39pm PDT 
SB to GA: OMG LOOK HOW MUCH FUN IT IS TO BAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by Jhoh Creexul 06/06/2003, 12:55am PDT 
he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by Chet Lollerson 06/06/2003, 11:18am PDT 
Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by FoK 06/06/2003, 11:38am PDT 
note to self: use fresher, edgier Flash animation humor NT by Stever Lollerson, ExAttorney At Law 06/06/2003, 11:57am PDT 
Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by Random Lurker 06/06/2003, 12:41pm PDT 
Here we go again. by Fullofkittens 06/06/2003, 12:54pm PDT 
Yeah, I know you guys do (got some email, etc.). Don't sweat it. NT by Senor Barborito 06/06/2003, 1:16pm PDT 
Re: Here we go again. by Joshua Michael Lollerson 06/07/2003, 1:49am PDT 
Re: Here we go again. by Steve Kittens 06/07/2003, 2:37am PDT 
On defending yourself. by No Pocky For Kitty 06/08/2003, 9:34am PDT 
Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by wide hurt 06/06/2003, 1:35pm PDT 
Re: he's actually taking it surprisingly well. but wtf is wrong with BDR? by Stryker 06/06/2003, 12:56pm PDT 
|
|