Jesus FUCK by Senor Barborito 07/01/2003, 4:52pm PDT 
Re: Jesus FUCK by E. L. Koba 07/02/2003, 4:58pm PDT
Re: Jesus FUCK by laudablepuss 07/02/2003, 6:41pm PDT
Re: Jesus FUCK by E. L. Koba 07/02/2003, 7:42pm PDT
Re: Jesus FUCK by Arbit 07/03/2003, 2:40am PDT
are you talking about the shit movie? by FABIO 07/03/2003, 3:30am PDT
Actually this is impossible AFAIK by Senor Barborito 07/03/2003, 4:16am PDT
Wrong by Senor Barborito 07/03/2003, 4:51am PDT
Ignoring the fact that Starship Troopers... by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 12:31pm PDT
Are you a Scientologist? NT by I need clarification 07/03/2003, 1:49pm PDT
SWEET JESUS NO. by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 1:52pm PDT
Also: Hubbard = Scientology, Heinlein = Starship Troopers NT by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 2:10pm PDT
Hubbard and Heinlein by jeep 07/03/2003, 2:49pm PDT
Re: Hubbard and Heinlein by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 2:55pm PDT
Re: Hubbard and Heinlein by whydirt, caltrops braintrust 07/03/2003, 4:17pm PDT
I think you are. NT by I need clarification 07/03/2003, 4:02pm PDT
Do you mean Libertarian? NT by LET'S PLAY SOME FUTURE FOOTBALL! 07/03/2003, 2:06pm PDT
Do you mean Futuresport? NT by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 2:09pm PDT
That's the point, you can't. Critical mass won't be different in the future. by Senor Barborito 07/03/2003, 3:29pm PDT
Is it possible that they could use something other than plutonium? NT by FoK 07/03/2003, 3:42pm PDT
Re: That's the point, you can't. Critical mass won't be different in the future. by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 3:54pm PDT
NO! ALL SF MUST BE HARD SF OR IT MUST DIE!!!! by Senor Barborito 07/04/2003, 8:08am PDT
|
|
