|
by E. L. Koba 07/02/2003, 7:42pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
laudablepuss wrote:
E. L. Koba wrote:
Senor Barborito wrote:
Sometimes the shit you come across reading the slashdot comments is pretty interesting.
--SB
One of the guys in my unit was an old vet with a shitload of years in. Back in the day, his original MOS was to parachute in with the SADM (the "steamer trunk" nuke they described), set it up behind enemy lines somewhere, then get the hell out of there. He said it was one heavy mother.
I assume it wasn't actually strapped to his back when he hit the ground.
But you don't KNOW, do you? ASSUME NOTHING SOLDIER! The extra weight would help get him to the ground quicker, thus minimizing the amount of time he'd be a floating target for the enemy!
But seriously, that sounds like a suicide mission. There was a joke in the old Paranoia game about a thermonuclear handgrenade. Printed on the device were the instructions: THROW VERY HARD.
One of the versions of the Davy Crocket (fired from a recoilles rifle on jeep) had a blast radius that was larger that the max effective range. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Jesus FUCK by Senor Barborito 07/01/2003, 4:52pm PDT 
Re: Jesus FUCK by E. L. Koba 07/02/2003, 4:58pm PDT 
Re: Jesus FUCK by laudablepuss 07/02/2003, 6:41pm PDT 
Re: Jesus FUCK by E. L. Koba 07/02/2003, 7:42pm PDT 
Re: Jesus FUCK by Arbit 07/03/2003, 2:40am PDT 
are you talking about the shit movie? by FABIO 07/03/2003, 3:30am PDT 
Actually this is impossible AFAIK by Senor Barborito 07/03/2003, 4:16am PDT 
Wrong by Senor Barborito 07/03/2003, 4:51am PDT 
Ignoring the fact that Starship Troopers... by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 12:31pm PDT 
Are you a Scientologist? NT by I need clarification 07/03/2003, 1:49pm PDT 
SWEET JESUS NO. by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 1:52pm PDT 
Also: Hubbard = Scientology, Heinlein = Starship Troopers NT by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 2:10pm PDT 
Hubbard and Heinlein by jeep 07/03/2003, 2:49pm PDT 
Re: Hubbard and Heinlein by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 2:55pm PDT 
Re: Hubbard and Heinlein by whydirt, caltrops braintrust 07/03/2003, 4:17pm PDT 
I think you are. NT by I need clarification 07/03/2003, 4:02pm PDT 
Do you mean Libertarian? NT by LET'S PLAY SOME FUTURE FOOTBALL! 07/03/2003, 2:06pm PDT 
Do you mean Futuresport? NT by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 2:09pm PDT 
That's the point, you can't. Critical mass won't be different in the future. by Senor Barborito 07/03/2003, 3:29pm PDT 
Is it possible that they could use something other than plutonium? NT by FoK 07/03/2003, 3:42pm PDT 
Re: That's the point, you can't. Critical mass won't be different in the future. by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 3:54pm PDT 
NO! ALL SF MUST BE HARD SF OR IT MUST DIE!!!! by Senor Barborito 07/04/2003, 8:08am PDT 
|
|