Forum Overview :: Rants
 
Ignoring the fact that Starship Troopers... by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 12:31pm PDT
...is science fiction set in the future. Perhaps they found a better way to lighten the weapons.

In the book the atomic grenades were popped off launchers on the powerarmor like present day armored vehicles might pop smoke grenades. They were almost specifically used to create battlefield mayhem and collateral damage. The bugs has a mean beam weapon in the book, but it was not effective against powerarmor on the bounce, especially when there was atomic grenades raining down all over. The film managed to miss the fucking point entirely, just like everything else from the book, and gay up the grenades into some kind of silver rpg faggyness that seemed to weigh 3 ounces.
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Jesus FUCK by Senor Barborito 07/01/2003, 4:52pm PDT NEW
    Re: Jesus FUCK by E. L. Koba 07/02/2003, 4:58pm PDT NEW
        Re: Jesus FUCK by laudablepuss 07/02/2003, 6:41pm PDT NEW
            Re: Jesus FUCK by E. L. Koba 07/02/2003, 7:42pm PDT NEW
            Re: Jesus FUCK by Arbit 07/03/2003, 2:40am PDT NEW
                are you talking about the shit movie? by FABIO 07/03/2003, 3:30am PDT NEW
                Actually this is impossible AFAIK by Senor Barborito 07/03/2003, 4:16am PDT NEW
                    Wrong by Senor Barborito 07/03/2003, 4:51am PDT NEW
                        Ignoring the fact that Starship Troopers... by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 12:31pm PDT NEW
                            Are you a Scientologist? NT by I need clarification 07/03/2003, 1:49pm PDT NEW
                                SWEET JESUS NO. by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 1:52pm PDT NEW
                                    Also: Hubbard = Scientology, Heinlein = Starship Troopers NT by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 2:10pm PDT NEW
                                        Hubbard and Heinlein by jeep 07/03/2003, 2:49pm PDT NEW
                                            Re: Hubbard and Heinlein by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 2:55pm PDT NEW
                                                Re: Hubbard and Heinlein by whydirt, caltrops braintrust 07/03/2003, 4:17pm PDT NEW
                                    I think you are. NT by I need clarification 07/03/2003, 4:02pm PDT NEW
                                Do you mean Libertarian? NT by LET'S PLAY SOME FUTURE FOOTBALL! 07/03/2003, 2:06pm PDT NEW
                                    Do you mean Futuresport? NT by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 2:09pm PDT NEW
                            That's the point, you can't. Critical mass won't be different in the future. by Senor Barborito 07/03/2003, 3:29pm PDT NEW
                                Is it possible that they could use something other than plutonium? NT by FoK 07/03/2003, 3:42pm PDT NEW
                                Re: That's the point, you can't. Critical mass won't be different in the future. by Chairman Mao 07/03/2003, 3:54pm PDT NEW
                                    NO! ALL SF MUST BE HARD SF OR IT MUST DIE!!!! by Senor Barborito 07/04/2003, 8:08am PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy