|
by Fullofkittens 06/08/2006, 11:59am PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Blobbio wrote:
Fullofkittens wrote:
Yeah, that movie sucks ass. I don't know why I thought it was scary.
I watched Scanners the other day and that was much better than I remembered, and also has a much better Awful Sytnhesizer Soundtrack than Prince Of Darkness, which is inexplicably about 1000X more lame and unscary than I remembered it being. Hmm.
I concede to FABIO that The Thing is much better.
I thought you said you watched it only a year or two ago?
I thought I had! I don't know, I must have been cranked up for some other reason, or maybe I was thinking of Event Horizon or something.
And if you asked me to name a better horror movie period than The Thing, I'd have to think long and hard.
I can think of several but I would be comfortable with it in my top 15.
In the Mouth of Madness seemed to do everything Prince of Darnkess was aiming for but with a better budget, writing, acting, and success.
That's a fun movie but I don't know if I'd call it scary. It has the unfortunate Stephen King Movie* effect of finally revealing the boogeyman and having the boogeyman look dorky. In the case of In The Mouth Of Madness the Lovecraftian Old Ones seem to be blood relations of The Engineer from Hellraiser, which was a giant rubber sock puppet. Up until that part it's pretty cool but after that you just have to laugh at it, which is cool too I guess.
*I know it's not a Stephen King Movie, but this typically happens in Stephen King Movies |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|