|
by Furcifer 09/10/2006, 1:40pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
I can't comment on the movie, but if it's essentially accurate in the required summation and fictionalization of events, then the movie should stand whether the particulars match history or not.
I can't comment on the movie because I know absoultely nothing about it, but I can make baseless assumptions about it that I only hope are true, and then comment approvingly on those.
"Dramatic license was certainly taken, but blame is spread pretty evenly across the board," Stanley writes in her review.
Because these days, fairness is all about spreading blame evenly, rather than assigning it accurately.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|