|
|
Forum Overview
::
Site Comments
|
|
|
by Ice Cream Jonsey 11/22/2008, 6:38pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Quétinbec wrote:
It's not good.
Yeah, to confirm:
- The posts we lost when my host got wonky: should that happen again, I would just leave the board down until I got a backup from them. I take one backup weekly, and in that case, they knocked us back to one day ahead of where my backup was. They DID offer to restore things after the fact (and I learned that calling them gets stuff resolved faster) so I am fairly confident we won't have a repeat there. I'd just put up a note saying what was going on.
- The spam was just a speed thing: I haven't had decent Internet access the last few days, and it will be a little bit before it's restored. It was a two keystroke thing to delete everything they were responding to, and then restore Jhoh's post. Editing the posts to get rid of the spam was too time-consuming, with what I have to work with. If I leave their posts alone, it raises page rank of whatever dumb shit they were selling, and I have too much nerd rage to let them get away with it. In the future, any time someone replies to a post with the word "grom" in it -- EXCEPT THIS ONE!!!! -- there is the chance that the conversation may be temporary.
Give me one sec and I'll link to the spam posts that the Google Cache grabbed. I did manage to get all of the spam posts up on the Internet Web Archive, but I can't remember my login for that. If you want to see them immediately, double-check any e-mail account you've had in the last 15 years and I think they, or the general jist of it, will be there.
ICJ |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
A number of threads have been deleted recently. by Quétinbec 11/22/2008, 5:49pm PST 
Pass. by Jerry Whorebach 11/22/2008, 5:59pm PST 
he's been posting all of it in the first place because we trolled him so bad he' by Weyoun Voidbringer 11/22/2008, 6:28pm PST 
Re: A number of threads have been deleted recently. by Ice Cream Jonsey 11/22/2008, 6:38pm PST 
28 and 42k. NT by Ray's guesses 11/23/2008, 10:42am PST 
Well that won't cut it, Ray. We can only hope you're wrong. NT by Quétinbec 11/24/2008, 2:53am PST 
I enjoy partial information problems. Let's speculate on how wrong I can be! by Ray of Light 11/24/2008, 1:07pm PST 
Re: I enjoy partial information problems. Let's speculate on how wrong I can b by Quétinbec 11/24/2008, 8:58pm PST 
Quebecker, how much do you think the regulars make? NT by Richard Ballsore 11/24/2008, 1:33pm PST 
I'm just going to come right out and tell everyone how much I make. by Jerry Whorebach 11/24/2008, 7:48pm PST 
Let me know how well you snuggle and your opinion on stomach hair NT by Quétinbec 11/25/2008, 12:22am PST 
I'm especially not going to marry you if you're going to be so skeezy about it. by Zsenitan 11/24/2008, 2:46pm PST 
It's better for everyone if we speak publicly about your salary. by Quétinbec 11/24/2008, 9:01pm PST 
Awesome by Fussbett 12/10/2008, 2:11pm PST 
Re: Awesome by motherfuckerfoodeater 12/10/2008, 2:32pm PST 
You mean the trenchcoat? NT by I kid, I kid 12/10/2008, 2:40pm PST 
You can't see the Dr. Who scarf but it's there NT by Fortinbras 12/10/2008, 3:09pm PST 
The lamp is a prop for the movie! NT by Fussbett 12/10/2008, 3:18pm PST 
Hmm, yes, upon reflection I see that a prop from a movie about text adventures by motherfuckerfoodeater 12/10/2008, 4:00pm PST 
It's more that they're forcing him. No fun to mock that. Plus: old news. NT by Fussbett 12/10/2008, 4:26pm PST 
Is he on Deadliest Catch, then? by laudablepuss 12/10/2008, 4:29pm PST 
Split level, motherfuckers by Ray of Light 12/10/2008, 5:41pm PST 
Re: Split level, motherfuckers by Ice Cream Jonsey 12/10/2008, 6:15pm PST 
|
|
|
|
|