|
|
Forum Overview
::
Vampire: The Masquerade:: Bloodlines
|
|
|
by FABIO 12/29/2004, 10:20pm PST |
|
|
|
|
|
I found it to be Diablo with a (then) pretty 3d engine (quake 2 I think), a plot, and less polish.
The major downside I thought was there was theoretically there were a ton of cool abilities you could work with and lots of cool ways to use them, but you never really got a chance to use them all with the frentic real time combat.
Combat was more strategic than Bloodlines though, but Bloodlines is more fun due to more & better story and dialog.
Eh, I'd say if you're into Diablo then it's worth $10. It does Diablo gameplay much MUCH better than Arcanum (and looks about twenty times better). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is the older Vampires game any good? by Bill Dungsroman 12/29/2004, 10:53am PST
No NT by MC Such and Such 12/29/2004, 10:59am PST
It's fucking terrible by Lizard_King 12/29/2004, 11:35am PST
Yes NT by Mysterio 12/29/2004, 1:22pm PST
No NT by Mysterio 12/29/2004, 5:01pm PST
I thought it was alright by FABIO 12/29/2004, 10:20pm PST
Re: I thought it was alright by Mysterio 12/30/2004, 7:15am PST
trumped by the reliable mysterio review by FABIO 12/30/2004, 3:42pm PST
Re: I thought it was alright by Mr. Kool 12/30/2004, 11:08am PST
Re: I thought it was alright by Mysterio 12/30/2004, 4:36pm PST
Does he catch rats for dinner? by Worm 12/30/2004, 4:52pm PST
Get Worm a stockbroker! by Mysterio 12/30/2004, 9:01pm PST
Re: Does he catch rats for dinner? by FABIO 12/30/2004, 10:15pm PST
Re: I thought it was alright by FABIO 12/30/2004, 10:14pm PST
Re: I thought it was alright by FABIO 12/31/2004, 12:31am PST
|
|
|
|
|