|
by I need clarification 03/02/2009, 5:48pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Choson wrote:
Creexuls, a monster >:3 wrote:
If Ozymandias, WHO IS THE BAD GUY IN THE COMIC BOOK AND MOVIE (OKAY NOW DON'T GO SEE IT, LOOK WHAT IT MADE ME DO TO MY MONOCLE COLLECTION), perhaps instead killed specifically people under 25, then this reviewer would be okay and would have enjoyed the movie, as long as the target of extermination was young people.
Also it seems stupid, but possibly a writer for the magazine called the New Yorker was all offended and pissy about New York being the target of a giant explosion attack thing that kills a bunch of people (but traffic still sucks in the morning).
Actually, I think Anthony Lane's British -- usually he's a pretty good critic to read and highly entertaining, although I think by default he hates most comic book-to-movie adaptations, as well he should.
No, no... no. He's terrible, and so is Denby. The New Yorker obviously hates movies and doesn't miss a chance to point it out, putting them on the very last page of the magazine (excluding their absolute least-favorite content: the user-generated cartoon captions some consultant told them to add to save their magazine from extinction), even after opera, literature, and TELEVISION reviews. Every review is a complete delineation of a movies' plot from beginning to end, almost as if the hopeless attempts by Hollywood to tell a story should be dismissed at the outset so we can concentrate instead on how badly they fucked everything else up. Movies are artless crap appreciated only by the very lowest of humans, and the only reason to talk about them in the New Yorker to remind ourselves that they and their fans exist and we should be careful to avoid them even if it means hailing a cab directly from the steps of Lincoln Center although it's only a couple of blocks to the Upper West. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
New Yorker review (full of spoilers most likely why haven't you read the book) by Entropy Stew 03/02/2009, 2:02pm PST 
why isn't rorschach's journal less crazy and more polished LIKE A NEW YORKER ART NT by Weyoun Voidbringer 03/02/2009, 2:16pm PST
Wow, the spoilers! by Fussbett 03/02/2009, 2:36pm PST
Yeah that's pretty much every possible spoiler. :( by Creexuls, a monster >:3 03/02/2009, 3:36pm PST
Re: Yeah that's pretty much every possible spoiler. :( by Choson 03/02/2009, 4:31pm PST
Re: Yeah that's pretty much every possible spoiler. :( by I need clarification 03/02/2009, 5:48pm PST
Re: Yeah that's pretty much every possible spoiler. :( by Driscoll 03/02/2009, 5:57pm PST
Re: Yeah that's pretty much every possible spoiler. :( by Choson 03/02/2009, 6:04pm PST
Filthy Critic NT by Last 03/03/2009, 8:20am PST
No. NT by Creexuls, a monster >:3 03/03/2009, 8:58am PST
I got as far as the "A's" (American Beauty: ****, American Psycho: **) NT by Jerry Whorebach 03/03/2009, 9:21am PST
Exactly. NT by Creexuls, a monster >:3 03/04/2009, 12:11pm PST
Wow, it's not like you guys to shit on a recommendation and not offer an alterna NT by Last 03/04/2009, 1:07pm PST
Jso and I recommend AO Scott and Roger Ebert. NT by Creexuls, a monster >:3 03/04/2009, 1:07pm PST
you made a bad recommendation and got called on your BULLSHIT NT by Weyoun Voidbringer 03/04/2009, 1:13pm PST
I wanted to link B. Fatt and Lazy but I guess one of them fucked Umberto? by Jerry Whorebach 03/04/2009, 1:39pm PST
New Yorkers (all of them) hate human beings and art and shit by Vested Id 03/02/2009, 3:23pm PST
Hey there IS an upside to that shitty gay review. ^_^ by Creexuls, a monster >:3 03/02/2009, 4:50pm PST
Re-tread of James Ellroy before Ellroy even wrote anything. NT by I need clarification 03/02/2009, 5:42pm PST
|
|
