|
by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 2:24am PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Out here in California in 2000, voters passed an act called the Defense of Marriage Proposition. While this sounds like an innocuous enough act, it actually was an attempt to cofidy the illegality of same-sex marriages. Rather than come out and say that fags shouldn't marry because GAY IS BAD ACCORDING TO TEH BIBLE, the authors of the proposition framed the argument in terms of heterosexual marriage. If fags are allowed to be legally married, it will lessen the meaning of straight marriage, the reasoning went.
The bill on face value is laughable (is marriage an institution that really needs defending? And how would gay marriage do harm to such an institution that has already withstood the continuous assaults of divorce, infidelity, bigamy, and of course spousal abuse?), but given more recent events, I wonder if it could be cited as a reason for prosecution of the major television networks.
After the "Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire?" fiasco (speaking of spousal abuse), Fox Television swore they wouldn't tread such hallowed grounds again. Of course, that was before the ratings came in. Now we have the Bachelor, the Bachelorette, Joe Millionaire, Meet the Parents, and Fox's latest assault, "Married by America."
If marriage of any type (straight, gay, or inter-species) ever needed defending, it's in need of it now, and not from teh gays. What does marriage mean anymore if it's roughly equivalent to winning the showcase thingy on The Price is Right?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a big fan of marriage. I could care less why someone gets married, or how entertaining it is to millions of Americans. But I do think fags deserve to be just as miserable as straights, and should be allowed the same tax benefits and inheritance rights as breeders. Maybe the best way to get rid of the anti-gay marriage laws already EXTANT is to use them to attack the major networks and their unending assault on marriage. Let's call bigotry and religious intolerance what it is, and may God have mercy on us all.
Amen. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Defense of Marriage by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 2:24am PST 
Fag lover -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 2:46am PST
You forgot the question mark at the end by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 2:49am PST
I felt the rivulet of semen issuing from your mouth was punctuation enough -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 3:15am PST
Rivulet? by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 3:57am PST
He's implying you're a fag by I need Obfuscation 03/03/2003, 5:29pm PST
Doesn't change the fact he used the word "rivulet" by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 7:00pm PST
Re: Doesn't change the fact he used the word "rivulet" by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 7:19pm PST
Oh yea and verily, thou art a fag by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 7:23pm PST
UNG! by monacle-wearing caveman 03/03/2003, 7:34pm PST
Well by Senor Barborito 03/03/2003, 7:42pm PST
The terrorist has won. by Fussbett 03/04/2003, 1:15am PST
Calm on down, ev-ery-body! by Senor Barborito 03/04/2003, 11:04am PST
Re: The terrorist has won. by Cal Trops 03/04/2003, 11:00pm PST
Hooo hoo hoo HAAAAAHHHH -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 7:43pm PST
Also, points off for me misspelling feces -nt- by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 8:43pm PST
Re: Oh yea and verily, thou art a fag by junior allen 03/04/2003, 9:07am PST
Wow, you burned me by I need clarification 03/04/2003, 8:21pm PST
Right, because one short thread = endless -nt- by Sensei Chairman Kaga 03/04/2003, 8:23pm PST
Hey, then you can get married! by Bill Dungsroman 03/04/2003, 11:29am PST
You've got to be fucking kidding me. by I need clarification 03/04/2003, 8:19pm PST
No, Caltrops is better by I need obfuscation 03/05/2003, 11:35am PST
Re: No, Caltrops is better by Bill Dungsroman 03/05/2003, 3:10pm PST
I couldn't have said it better myself by I need clarification 03/05/2003, 3:55pm PST
I feel like doing a cNo breakdown by Bill "Whore" Dungsroman 03/05/2003, 5:19pm PST
Let's clarify something here. by Mischief Maker 03/09/2003, 11:45am PST
You forgot a part... by I need clarification 03/10/2003, 6:43pm PST
Re: Defense of Marriage by Lufteufel 03/03/2003, 3:15am PST
Re: Defense of Marriage by FoK 03/03/2003, 9:14am PST
Re: Defense of Marriage by Bill Dungsroman 03/03/2003, 10:34am PST
Er, what? by laudablepuss 03/03/2003, 12:08pm PST
PUS versus PUSS by Fussbett 03/03/2003, 1:47pm PST
Or not. by laudablePUSS 03/03/2003, 4:00pm PST
Phlogiston. (nt) by Zseni 03/03/2003, 4:29pm PST
Re: Phlogiston. (nt) by laudablepuss 03/03/2003, 5:16pm PST
logastellus? (nt) NT by Mr. Palomar 03/04/2003, 10:25am PST
It only goes one way. -nt- by laudablepuss 03/04/2003, 10:41am PST
Well, that was pretty funny. by Fussbett 03/03/2003, 5:08pm PST
Re: Well, that was pretty funny. by laudablepuss 03/03/2003, 5:18pm PST
A sad denouement to a fantastic spelling debate. by Fussbett 03/03/2003, 5:38pm PST
Fussbett the new subcom? NT NT by Senor Barborito 03/03/2003, 5:42pm PST
Re: A sad denouement to a fantastic spelling debate. by laudablepuss 03/03/2003, 6:09pm PST
Re: A sad denouement to a fantastic spelling debate. by Fussbett 03/03/2003, 6:21pm PST
Dude I totally nailed your mom after reading this NT NT by The Other Game 03/03/2003, 5:45pm PST
Wait for it... by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 5:59pm PST
Nay. by laudablepuss 03/03/2003, 6:15pm PST
Re: Nay. by Ray, of Light 03/03/2003, 6:26pm PST
Not likely by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 6:31pm PST
Merriam Webster succinctly weighs in. by abrit 03/03/2003, 8:08pm PST
Hye, I messspeled mi own fuking nic. -nt NT by arbit 03/03/2003, 8:54pm PST
I DON'T NEED YOUR CHARITY, FAGGOT -nt- by laudablepuss 03/05/2003, 1:08pm PST
Well, my two thread being right streak is over by laudablepuss 03/04/2003, 10:23am PST
Never underestimate the power of my Big D -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 03/04/2003, 6:16pm PST
Bullshit by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 4:07pm PST
California: a case-study in crazy-ass idealism by Ray, of Light 03/03/2003, 6:22pm PST
|
|
