Forum Overview
::
Balance of Power
::
Cambridge Analytica
[quote name="blackwater"]So the whole Cambridge Analytica thing seems to be another witch hunt for the top secret vodoo doctors who got Trump elected. Just like with the whole Russian scare, the theory seems to be that people would never, ever vote for Trump on their own or on the basis of his platform. Therefore, there must be evil masterminds pulling the strings behind the scenes, making the normally good American voters turn evil. In my opinion, if the New York Times wants to know who got Trump elected, they should look in the mirror. Nobody held a gun to their heads and made them run wall-to-wall coverage on Trump's antics all through the primaries. They saw him as a joke candidate (hey, he's that guy from The Apprentice!), a good way to embarrass their Republican ideological enemies. But the joke was on them. There was actually a lot less support for open borders and free trade than what they thought. Poor Zuck. He must have thought he'd make such a great statesman for the Democrats. But they threw him to the wolves like some comic book supervillain punishing a wayward henchman. <img src="https://media1.popsugar-assets.com/files/thumbor/0a8NZzbaPhGBgaBMtgKU6SAZg3Q/fit-in/2048xorig/filters:format_auto-!!-:strip_icc-!!-/2017/09/05/989/n/38761221/tmp_Tp2QTZ_65cb6f7198b02448_GettyImages-669889770.jpg" width=320> Jeff Bezos was smart to buy the Washington Post. Why didn't Zuck buy NYT? it would have been chump change for him. But he was too busy re-creating the Virtual Boy. <img src="https://c.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/luckey.png" width=320> Sad![/quote]