Forum Overview :: Motherfucking News :: Re: Q: Yes or no? A: Apricots.

[quote name="Fussbett"]I agree with Fabio, in thinking that you're not a real person, but I respect your efforts regardless. [quote name="blah blah blah"]They can afford to be wasteful.[/quote] <table border=1 cellpadding=20 align="center"><tr class="post"><td>WASTEFUL</td><td>GENEROUS</td><td>COST OF DOING BUSINESS</td><td>EFFICIENT</td><td>ECONOMIC BOOM!</td></tr> <tr class="post"><td>$7.25<br>2009</td><td>$5.15<br>2006</td><td>$1.20<br>India</td><td>$0.25<br>China</td><td>slavery</td></tr></table> It's certainly true that the economy would be spurred on with a lower or no minimum wage and that's not the point of a minimum wage law, obviously. The question is "How much of that increased GDP will Trickle-down™ to the people making $3/hour?" With unemployment at an all-time low, it'll sure seem like things are going great. <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6813529239937418232&q=label%3Afree+market">"The most anti-negro law on the books of this land"</a>, Milton Friedman on a PBS show with maybe the most terrifying opening theme ever recorded.[/quote]