Forum Overview
::
Site Comments
::
Re: Looks like Caltrops has competition :(
[quote name="Mischief Maker"][quote name="Quentin Beck"]One thing seems to prevail on this site: the inabilty to shut the fuck up and be concise. It's all BLAH BLAH BLAH LOOK HOW I COMPARE THIS TO COMMUNISM BLAH BLAH BLAH TERRIBLE ANALOGY BLAH BLAH BLAH 10 PARAGRAPHS AND COUNTING NOW etc. etc. Somewhere along the line they seem to forget what the hell they were bitching about and just go on ranting how the industry is clueless and gamers are the proverbial albatrosses around developers' necks. I don't understand how someone can take so long to say something as simple as "GoW 2 lacks depth." In contrast, Caltrops reviews are funny. Caltrops reviews are (usually) informative. Caltrops reviews don't consist of 83 hojillion paragraphs asserting that I shouldn't buy a game because WE'RE BEYOND DOUBLE JUMPS!!111!1111!1 I give this site a ">:[" out of a possible "^_^".[/quote] Not to mention maintaining a consistent tone. I had to double check that the GOW2 review was negative. Can anyone tell me what was the point of the whole segue about useless rolling in Zelda verses useful and necessary rolls in GOW2? They promise bitter and angry and british, instead I get doped up phish fan trying to explain the concept of god. I heard GOW2 recycles the same basic enemies with the exact same fatalities. Negative.[/quote]