|
|
| |
Forum Overview
::
Peter Molyneux's The Movies
|
| |
|
by fabio 07/02/2012, 1:26pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Great if you like romantic comedies, but how low is the bar if that's what passes as a nuanced character study? Critics and forums were talking about it in the same breath as Raging Bull. A movie forfeits its chance at being smart the instant it casts John Lithgow. They should have just gone all out and had him move in with the apes flinging poo all day.
If we go by relative scale, it turns out zealot fans were right and maybe The Matrix really was deep meaningful genius. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
Speaking of shitty prequels by fabio 07/02/2012, 12:44am PDT 
Rise of the planet of the apes was great. by Gutsby 07/02/2012, 9:56am PDT 
It was a love story between Franco and the monkey by fabio 07/02/2012, 1:26pm PDT 
Planet of the Apes was science fiction; Rise was more like anti-science fiction. by Jerry Whorebach 07/02/2012, 2:27pm PDT 
Mother-FUCK Rise of the Planet of the Apes! by Mischief Maker 07/08/2012, 8:33pm PDT 
In other news, Abe Lincoln Vampire Hunter wasn't half bad by fabio 07/04/2012, 12:39pm PDT 
Why doesn't any of the critical quality trickle down to Half in the Bag? by fabio 07/24/2012, 9:23pm PDT 
Re: Why doesn't any of the critical quality trickle down to Half in the Bag? by Mischief Maker 07/25/2012, 5:01am PDT 
He certainly has the douchey film major look down NT by fabio 07/25/2012, 10:35am PDT 
|
|
| |
|
| |