Forum Overview :: Site Comments
 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/09/2004, 11:20pm PDT
Zseni wrote:

You're totally insane, for starters. I mean starkers. INC is right (in more than just the fact that he agrees with me):
No, it pretty much ends there for the both of you. Time was, INC had his own opinions, and they were pretty fucking spot-on. Now: just some me-too queerleading. He doesn't even read your posts, incidentally.

Zseni wrote:

you're an angry, angry man, so angry that you haven't been having any fun here for oh I'd say about a year now.
You mean, since I became admin? Ookay! GameFAGs assault: not fun. Clowning on you: not fun. Football, RPG deconstructions, troll-smashing, Barborito-crunching: all SOOOO not fun. Oh, and anger-inducing, I forgot that. So mad. Growl.

Zseni wrote:

Your memory IS faulty. Your troll post brought up two examples of this:
1. Fussbett's FUCK YOU post. Never happened,
Yes it did, more times than I invoked Godwin's Law (but over a longer period of time)

Zseni wrote:

and what's worse is that it is completely unlikely to boot.
It happened many a time. It happened when he got one-upped on Leisuretown. It prompted me to joke (back then) that some forums should be renamed: Site Comments should become BDR Sucks by The Internet, Gamerasutra should be I Suck at This Game by FABIO, and NEWS should be Fuck You by Fussbett. Lost to the ether, more is the pity.

Zseni wrote:

Fussbett has the coolest jets here, chief, and has had them for a considerable time. He doesn't even post unless he's got forms countersigned in triplicate from his post excellence engineers.
Which is why it's of singular note when he gets riled. It is totally against type, which is why I always noted it.

Zseni wrote:

2. Zseni's PURPLE JUNTA RAGE. Remember what that was about? No, it wasn't a tantrum! It was Zseni saying she would like articles and article editing to be in the forums, and if they weren't in the forums she wouldn't like to be a part of them.
And all that was, you spastic cunt, yet you saw fit to blast us all via email before a decision had even been made. Additionally, what a fucking dumbass reason to excommunicate yourself for the email list. The lookitme! histrionics of that event evidently still to this day completely escape you. Funnier still as it was essentially a smaller-scale FitM war that you likewise preemptively waged on us.

Zseni wrote:

Zseni was writing herself out of the Purple Junta, and you were most vocal about it!
If coming to caltrops and announcing that having a forum to workshop articles was going to be instituted and was a great idea, and fully crediting you with it is the vocality of which you speak, then guilty as charged. What that has to do with you having to be a screeching maniacal harpy when we were already heading towards a Yes vote is beyond all of us. Excpet that it makes you insane that your vote might only count as one (1) among a group. Zsenii potentially outvoted on an issue? AAAAAGH I QUIT! Fucking weak, sister.


Zseni wrote:

But but but but in your last explosive shitheap, the "troll" post, you expressly claimed you MISSED watching me YAMMER PEOPLE INTO THE GROUND. What, in your hazy halcyon fever-dreams of Caltrops yore, did you think that looked like, exactly? Someone getting totally humiliated by their own stupidity, with me as commentator? You're looking at that one right now.
But but but you just in the post above apologized TO ME for being a diluted version of the former you. Hence, disappointment.

Zseni wrote:

Well no, you aren't using it, because it's out of your personal control.
Hey, if we really get a caltrops/wikipedia off the ground, when it's all we can do to get the basic caltrops version running, I'm all for it. But, we won't. What's your point?

Zseni wrote:

You mean those people are making fun of me?

BTW I cannot believe you're so anal-retentive that you typed in the name="Zseni" for each and every quoted section. Tell me you cut and pasted, at least.
Christ. Ask another dumb question.

Zseni wrote:

Seconds ago you were protesting my libel against the faultless working of your memory, and here you are squandering your most priceless virtue: your reputation for honest self-examination. BDR, really, I'm not worth it.
And I thought that virtue was boring and ridiculous? Or whatever words you used, my FAULTLESS PHOTOGRAPHIC MEMORY fails me again.

Zseni wrote:

You know, I was a pioneer in the not-putting-Caltrops-into-the-hands-of-lunatics movement, and I got a lot of shit for it then.
You got a lot of shit for GRANNY SPAM, dipshit.


Zseni wrote:

I don't expect that shit to stop coming down the line for it now that Lead Psycho Apologist is frothing at the best regulars and proclaiming everywhere that Caltrops is his site. A user admin! His site!
It was a joke post; you fell for it. Notice Creexul did not. "Everywhere" in this instance appears to be Qt3, where I call it my site immediately preceding a lengthy explanation of what my actual part in the site is, while - oh no, the coup de grace! - curiously omitting that I'm an admin here!


Zseni wrote:

So often genius is mistaken for pretentious pablum by those who have not the wit nor education to understand it. But do you elect to learn, or to scoff loudly with your braying donkey "friends" at the brave soldier of truth who speaks a language that you cannot yet comprehend?
Getting tipsy off plum brandy? Truly, thou dost forge untrod ground brazenly.


Zseni wrote:

One may speak all the wisdom of the ages to a dog, but the dog only recognizes the sound of its name. I think this is why you jump all over me for mentioning your name, and have nothing at all to say about the priceless pearls of knowledge I scatter hither and yon across this forum.
Is it still grandstanding if no one is around to be annoyed by it?


Zseni wrote:

What does "TOP of google" even mean, you crazy crazy person?
#1, at the TOP of the page. Are you still hitting the plum brandy or something?


Zseni wrote:

Self-censure what? Your personal ongoing life trauma is an open book thanks to your demonstrable inability to keep your minute-to-minute emotional status out of your posts.
Then go for it: rip me open with all my life happenings over the last 12 months.


Zseni wrote:

Yes, you certainly have, along with a Hunter S. Thompson-style laundry list of hard and heavy recreational (and vocational!) drugs. On the count of me not being half the scary drug-abusing felon you are, I find me: guilty as charged.
A second ago you were an interpid adventurer recounting your lurid tales of intoxication, now you're (more appropriately) Polly Prissypants re-arranging tea cozies and tsking the misadventures of the riff-raff.


Zseni wrote:

Let me spell this out for him, for there is none so blind as he who will not see: you see, BDR? You think I'm talking about you even when I'm talking about someone completely different, and then - when I actually AM talking about you, you think I'm talking about someone else! Because you're stone cold nuts!
Do I need to list every post you mention me in? It's every single one. You mention me at the end of that one. Also, the point I'm making is projection, as in the psychological behavior. You reek of it.

Zseni wrote:

You totally believed "SB" when "he" "told you" that I had posted several anonymous criticisms of you.
Nope. I just figured it out easily enough on my own. He was talking about you atoring in arguments with him. You, sucking OGF's cock as Zseni and then in an anonynmous slam on me. And so on.


Zseni wrote:

Criticisms, you later whined, that "hurt", criticisms you "knew" had to come from "me." Only they didn't, and you are particularly bad at picking out my ATORs - happily replying to Hobo, for example, when Hobo posts apologetic praise to you using my nick, and happily indicting totally unrelated ATORs as being my work. Of course most of that stuff is gone now, along with the rest of Old Caltrops.
I whined. You begged me to go to AIM and pleaded that I never reply to you anymore.

Zseni wrote:

Likewise I'm not trying to trick you into doing anything here. You're just paranoid. Clinically? Dunno, but you have to be getting close to it by now.
Lazy, perhaps. I see you mentioning me nonstop, I make a tactical error. Indeed, mea culpa. What does any of that have to do with you being boring and stupid?


Zseni wrote:

Well, I was being a bit flip since we all know your drug of choice is cocaine.
What?


Zseni wrote:

But short of that I would say you're drunk...a lot! Because you're irrationally angry and no longer able to tell when people are joking or not;


Neither are most of the people here. But, as usual, it's my fault either way.

Zseni wrote:

because you have problems handling your Caltrops; because you're replying in horrible earnestness to a post that was 90% obvious mockery to 10% well-worn truth. Who knows what your other substance abuse problems are? I think I saw an episode of Law And Order like this, but I'm pretty sure that within five years you are engaging in illegal organ transactions with international crime lords in order to score your fixes.
Re: the bolded part: it's part of your problem.

Zseni wrote:

Hey I'm not stupid, I watched Poltergeist 2.
Wow, that was a weak dodge.


Zseni wrote:

You no doubt can down 12 shots of anything without even thinking about it, on one count because you drink early and often and that's just to get you to your three martini lunch, and on the other count because you're going to offset it straight away with an ephedrine/cocaine cocktail.
No, I shoot heroin! Into my eyeballs for lack of patent vessels!


Zseni wrote:

But 12 shots, later going up to 18 and change, in a two hour period - that's not too bad for a young lady who isn't addicted to anything at all!
Late-breaking news to up your drinking 1337ness! Also, who fucking cares, back to my original point.

Zseni wrote:

You can't even remember stuff that happened yesterday, can you? What am I talking about, you probably can't even remember stuff you posted five minutes ago.
Ad hominems, ad nauseum.

Zseni wrote:

Your responses don't validate anything but the level and intensity of your "annoyance": high, and tight. Indirectly you are giving the signal that my criticism is something you take more personally than you take the average poster's, therefore there's something special about either it or me. I'm sorry, dummy, but there is no magic post vortex that sucks up your motivation for responding and replaces it with "totally chill conversation for fun."
Then you're likewise, hooray for the both of us. Except, somehow you're "magically" not, I'm assuming.


Zseni wrote:

I don't think you're bored with me. You're reading most of - if not all - my posts and you respond to some of them at considerable length. You keep bringing up Binro like it's a meaningful comparison, but Binro was and is a genuinely sick individual who had and has a compulsion to post in a place that would punish him for doing so. At the present moment you are much closer to that line than I am: admitting hurt, and "annoyance", and anger, and continuing to return to the source(s) of those negative emotions.
Wow, this dodge will never get told with you. Yes Zseni, you automatically win when I respond to you, the same as every troll ever of any sublevel of intellect. I read all the janitor's posts, too.


Zseni wrote:

I wanted Caltrops out of SB's hands because he was generally unreliable and prone to misusing his administrative powers. I want Caltrops out of your hands because you can't take it here anymore, and I think it's only a matter of time before you crack and do yourself some permanent damage. You will no doubt respond, either here or to yourself, with a mass of excuses and protestations that you were just trolling or kidding or it's a big joke or I'm pulling some kind of savior act. But I don't mind pushing you over the edge just to watch you fall, for starters, and after that you should consider why you're so immensely defensive. Maybe you don't want to admit that reason to me or to anyone else on here, but if you can't admit it to yourself then you have a serious problem and you need to, at the very least, take a good long break from this site and get your head screwed on straight again.
Yeah, not really. Your rhetoric notwithstanding.


Zseni wrote:

I don't need to lecture you on obsessive-compulsive behavior, BDR. You know the symptoms and signs, but you might not realize that you're presenting them. You are.
Okay.

PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
I am drunk. by Zseni 08/06/2004, 9:02pm PDT NEW
    Could you blog somewhere else? by Worm 08/06/2004, 9:41pm PDT NEW
        Re: Could you blog somewhere else? by Chairman Mao 08/07/2004, 11:12am PDT NEW
            Re: Could you blog somewhere else? by wherever 08/07/2004, 5:00pm PDT NEW
    All the alcohol is being absorbed by your fat NT by Just an observation 08/06/2004, 10:38pm PDT NEW
        Re: All the alcohol is being absorbed by your fat by Zseni 08/07/2004, 4:56am PDT NEW
    I was drunk last night, too. by I need clarification 08/07/2004, 10:00am PDT NEW
    Welcome to the club! OH WOW ALCOHOL! NT by Tycho 08/07/2004, 3:05pm PDT NEW
    Re: I am drunk. by William H. Hayt, Jr. 08/07/2004, 3:44pm PDT NEW
        Re: I am drunk. by Zseni 08/07/2004, 5:59pm PDT NEW
            But your I'm drunk post... by Oblong 08/07/2004, 7:03pm PDT NEW
            Re: I am drunk. by DeadDogBuried 08/07/2004, 7:11pm PDT NEW
            I didn't write that. The drinking, I take it? by Bill Dungsroman 08/07/2004, 7:15pm PDT NEW
                pre-emptive double-dumbass on BDR by whydirt 08/07/2004, 8:46pm PDT NEW
                    Re: pre-emptive double-dumbass on BDR by Bill Dungsroman 08/07/2004, 10:15pm PDT NEW
                        Re: pre-emptive double-dumbass on BDR by Zseni 08/08/2004, 10:06am PDT NEW
                            Re: pre-emptive double-dumbass on BDR by Bill Dungsroman 08/08/2004, 5:34pm PDT NEW
                                Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Zseni 08/08/2004, 5:52pm PDT NEW
                                    Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by I need clarification 08/08/2004, 6:08pm PDT NEW
                                        Damn you're a cum-dumpster of unoriginality. by Ormus 08/08/2004, 6:43pm PDT NEW
                                            You used "sko" like you were Zseni. Way to bite her style, Creepo. NT by I need clarification 08/08/2004, 7:05pm PDT NEW
                                    Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Worm 08/08/2004, 6:52pm PDT NEW
                                        Pretend the missing 's' and the unnecessary space aren't there. Thanks. NT by Worm 08/08/2004, 6:54pm PDT NEW
                                    Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/08/2004, 8:57pm PDT NEW
                                        Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Zseni 08/09/2004, 4:08am PDT NEW
                                            Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by wherever 08/09/2004, 1:43pm PDT NEW
                                            Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/09/2004, 11:20pm PDT NEW
                                                Here I am again! by Fussbett 08/10/2004, 6:36pm PDT NEW
                                                    Re: Here I am again! by Bill Dungsroman 08/10/2004, 10:36pm PDT NEW
                                                        Get the FUCK off me! NT by Fussbett's high horse 08/10/2004, 11:05pm PDT NEW
                                                        Leisuretown was suppose to be my breakout thread by Pieter 08/11/2004, 12:52am PDT NEW
                                                        For the record, I used to share the AIM love with you. by I need clarification 08/11/2004, 2:31am PDT NEW
                                                            INC to BDR: "And I faked all my orgasms, too!" by Bill Dungsroman 08/11/2004, 2:43am PDT NEW
                                                                Re: INC to BDR: "And I faked all my orgasms, too!" by I need clarification 08/11/2004, 2:47am PDT NEW
                                                        People - please, please, we're losing the point here. by Kthor 08/11/2004, 8:04am PDT NEW
                                                            Re: People - please, please, we're losing the point here. by I need clarification 08/11/2004, 12:15pm PDT NEW
                                                                Me :( by curst 08/12/2004, 1:48pm PDT NEW
                                                        Re: Here I am again! by laudablepuss 08/11/2004, 6:02pm PDT NEW
                                                            ON MY OWN! GOiN Down the only road I've ever known! like a drifter I was born t NT by whydirt 08/11/2004, 9:00pm PDT NEW
                                                        This is a very pedantic post. by Fussbett 08/11/2004, 8:52pm PDT NEW
                                                            Thanks for the warning. by Bill Dungsroman 08/12/2004, 10:46am PDT NEW
                                                                Yeah! by Fussbett 08/12/2004, 6:20pm PDT NEW
                                                Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Zseni 08/11/2004, 5:34pm PDT NEW
                                                    Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/11/2004, 8:20pm PDT NEW
                                                        Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by I need clarification 08/11/2004, 8:39pm PDT NEW
                                                            Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/12/2004, 10:43am PDT NEW
                                            Re: something or other by Hairsplitter 08/10/2004, 12:06am PDT NEW
                                                BDR's Brawl Hall article ranks highly by Entropy Stew 08/10/2004, 12:14am PDT NEW
                                                    See? by I need clarification 08/10/2004, 12:46am PDT NEW
                                        Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by corax 08/09/2004, 6:54pm PDT NEW
                                            Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/09/2004, 7:06pm PDT NEW
                                        Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by I need clarification 08/09/2004, 7:48pm PDT NEW
            Re: I am drunk. by William H. Hayt, Jr. 08/08/2004, 12:05am PDT NEW
                Re: I am drunk. by Zseni 08/08/2004, 10:09am PDT NEW
                You're really boring. I regret I read any of that. :( NT by I need clarification 08/08/2004, 12:34pm PDT NEW
                    Mwaah! NT by Inc's Lips on Zseni's rotund ass 08/08/2004, 12:38pm PDT NEW
                        YEAH NO TELLING THE TRUTH ALLOWED NT by CaltropsPostersUniteAgainstZseni 08/08/2004, 2:37pm PDT NEW
                            ROFL by Truth Telling? 08/08/2004, 3:40pm PDT NEW
                                LOL! ROFLMAO!!! NT by Internet laughing guy 08/08/2004, 6:24pm PDT NEW
                        You're right, that was a great post. I hope BILL posts a lot more (for you). :) NT by I need clarification 08/08/2004, 3:35pm PDT NEW
    Re: I am drunk. by Fullofkittens 08/07/2004, 5:28pm PDT NEW
    Re: I am drunk. by Truth Telling? 08/08/2004, 4:10pm PDT NEW
        Re: I am drunk. by Chairman Mao 08/08/2004, 6:01pm PDT NEW
            Re: I am drunk. by Chairman Mao 08/08/2004, 6:07pm PDT NEW
                Re: I am drunk. by Chairman Mao 08/08/2004, 6:10pm PDT NEW
                    Re: I am drunk. by Chairman Mao 08/08/2004, 7:13pm PDT NEW
                        LOGGINSNOWPLZKTHX. by Chairman Dorkface 08/08/2004, 8:20pm PDT NEW
                            Re: LOGGINSNOWPLZKTHX. by Vverner Von Monocle 08/08/2004, 11:06pm PDT NEW
    HeylookanotherTrainwreckZsenithreadhownice by Entropy Stew 08/09/2004, 4:16pm PDT NEW
        SHORT REVIEW: Northern Virginia by Ray of Light 08/09/2004, 8:14pm PDT NEW
            I'm an n-tiered systems protagonist by Entropy Stew 08/09/2004, 8:46pm PDT NEW
                Re: I'm an n-tiered systems protagonist by whydirt 08/09/2004, 9:21pm PDT NEW
                    DECLAROBANG NT by Indefenestrable Stew 08/11/2004, 3:14am PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy