 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Underdogs, less reliable than Gamefaqs? by FABIO 02/16/2003, 8:08am PST | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| Ok, sure the gamefaq forums make the ones at SA look like...well, us. But at least you can usually find some good, accurate reviews there.
Now take the underdogs. They're a great site that does a great service, but who the fuck does their reviews? Here we have System Shock 2 Ok I sort of understand this glowing review; all the magazine reviewers love sucking this game's cock so it's hard not to jump on the bandwagon being pulled by the man train. But how do you explain This Even more oddly, reader scores rate this one at a 9.3 while SS2 gets a 9.0. Now I know I've built my career around hating SS2, but even I know it can't possibly be worse than this crap. These aren't even insane forum review, they're the official site review. Fuckers |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Underdogs, less reliable than Gamefaqs? by 02/16/2003, 8:08am PST  Re: Underdogs, less reliable than Gamefaqs? by 02/17/2003, 7:05pm PST Re: Underdogs, less reliable than Gamefaqs? by 02/17/2003, 10:11pm PST Trusting GameFAQ reviews is like trusting Amazon reviews -NT- NT by 02/17/2003, 8:57pm PST |
