|
by Bill Dungsroman 03/04/2003, 11:29am PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
I need clarification wrote:
Caltrops is becoming quite unbearable.
And yet you're still hanging in there! Like a veteran news reporter in a war-torn land, you press on to deliver The Real Story. Too bad your camera's off, your mic is dead and your only audience is the dictator's evil soldiers, who'd rather be raping pre-teen boys.
I need clarification wrote:
The content is pretty musty,
DEADLINES ARE FOR FAGGOTS! Anyway, we've discovered that the amount a site sucks is directly proportional to the frequency with which it updates. This explains why OMM r007d and somethingawful dr007z.
I need clarification wrote:
and 90% of the posts seem to be of the [nt] variety. The other 10% are guys arguing which martial art is the most bad-ass.
You're very bad at math. Your posts are barely more than a sentence or two, except when you're garnering votes so you can marry your sweetie Phil in Orange County. Fag.
I need clarification wrote:
How about instead of announcing to everyone how gay you are, you try to do something more to prepare for the alleged influx of Mac Hall readers than make up some new rules?
What, you're not getting the emails? Since, you know, one of our first new rules is to pass all decisions regarding the site past the dumbest, worst troll available. So, you know, buried among the lurid invites to see HOT WET TEENS IN ACTION and even more lurid REFINANCE NOW BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE requests are the Keys to Our Success.
I need clarification wrote:
Why not greet them with more than System Shock 2 and Half-Life Mod reviews?
Or do you even care?
At least as much as you do about fags marrying, I'd wager.
BDR
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Defense of Marriage by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 2:24am PST 
Fag lover -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 2:46am PST 
You forgot the question mark at the end by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 2:49am PST 
I felt the rivulet of semen issuing from your mouth was punctuation enough -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 3:15am PST 
Rivulet? by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 3:57am PST 
He's implying you're a fag by I need Obfuscation 03/03/2003, 5:29pm PST 
Doesn't change the fact he used the word "rivulet" by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 7:00pm PST 
Re: Doesn't change the fact he used the word "rivulet" by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 7:19pm PST 
Oh yea and verily, thou art a fag by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 7:23pm PST 
UNG! by monacle-wearing caveman 03/03/2003, 7:34pm PST 
Well by Senor Barborito 03/03/2003, 7:42pm PST 
The terrorist has won. by Fussbett 03/04/2003, 1:15am PST 
Calm on down, ev-ery-body! by Senor Barborito 03/04/2003, 11:04am PST 
Re: The terrorist has won. by Cal Trops 03/04/2003, 11:00pm PST 
Hooo hoo hoo HAAAAAHHHH -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 7:43pm PST 
Also, points off for me misspelling feces -nt- by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 8:43pm PST 
Re: Oh yea and verily, thou art a fag by junior allen 03/04/2003, 9:07am PST 
Wow, you burned me by I need clarification 03/04/2003, 8:21pm PST 
Right, because one short thread = endless -nt- by Sensei Chairman Kaga 03/04/2003, 8:23pm PST 
Hey, then you can get married! by Bill Dungsroman 03/04/2003, 11:29am PST 
You've got to be fucking kidding me. by I need clarification 03/04/2003, 8:19pm PST 
No, Caltrops is better by I need obfuscation 03/05/2003, 11:35am PST 
Re: No, Caltrops is better by Bill Dungsroman 03/05/2003, 3:10pm PST 
I couldn't have said it better myself by I need clarification 03/05/2003, 3:55pm PST 
I feel like doing a cNo breakdown by Bill "Whore" Dungsroman 03/05/2003, 5:19pm PST 
Let's clarify something here. by Mischief Maker 03/09/2003, 11:45am PST 
You forgot a part... by I need clarification 03/10/2003, 6:43pm PST 
Re: Defense of Marriage by Lufteufel 03/03/2003, 3:15am PST 
Re: Defense of Marriage by FoK 03/03/2003, 9:14am PST 
Re: Defense of Marriage by Bill Dungsroman 03/03/2003, 10:34am PST 
Er, what? by laudablepuss 03/03/2003, 12:08pm PST 
PUS versus PUSS by Fussbett 03/03/2003, 1:47pm PST 
Or not. by laudablePUSS 03/03/2003, 4:00pm PST 
Phlogiston. (nt) by Zseni 03/03/2003, 4:29pm PST 
Re: Phlogiston. (nt) by laudablepuss 03/03/2003, 5:16pm PST 
logastellus? (nt) NT by Mr. Palomar 03/04/2003, 10:25am PST 
It only goes one way. -nt- by laudablepuss 03/04/2003, 10:41am PST 
Well, that was pretty funny. by Fussbett 03/03/2003, 5:08pm PST 
Re: Well, that was pretty funny. by laudablepuss 03/03/2003, 5:18pm PST 
A sad denouement to a fantastic spelling debate. by Fussbett 03/03/2003, 5:38pm PST 
Fussbett the new subcom? NT NT by Senor Barborito 03/03/2003, 5:42pm PST 
Re: A sad denouement to a fantastic spelling debate. by laudablepuss 03/03/2003, 6:09pm PST 
Re: A sad denouement to a fantastic spelling debate. by Fussbett 03/03/2003, 6:21pm PST 
Dude I totally nailed your mom after reading this NT NT by The Other Game 03/03/2003, 5:45pm PST 
Wait for it... by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 5:59pm PST 
Nay. by laudablepuss 03/03/2003, 6:15pm PST 
Re: Nay. by Ray, of Light 03/03/2003, 6:26pm PST 
Not likely by Entropy Stew 03/03/2003, 6:31pm PST 
Merriam Webster succinctly weighs in. by abrit 03/03/2003, 8:08pm PST 
Hye, I messspeled mi own fuking nic. -nt NT by arbit 03/03/2003, 8:54pm PST 
I DON'T NEED YOUR CHARITY, FAGGOT -nt- by laudablepuss 03/05/2003, 1:08pm PST 
Well, my two thread being right streak is over by laudablepuss 03/04/2003, 10:23am PST 
Never underestimate the power of my Big D -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 03/04/2003, 6:16pm PST 
Bullshit by I need clarification 03/03/2003, 4:07pm PST 
California: a case-study in crazy-ass idealism by Ray, of Light 03/03/2003, 6:22pm PST 
|
|