Forum Overview :: Reviews
 
Even Ray is right twice a day by Entropy Stew 08/29/2004, 10:42pm PDT
Zseni wrote:

William H. Hayt, Jr. wrote:

curst wrote:

SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!!! + boring = boring.


According to this equation, boring - boring = supply zones. 0 = supply zones? I DON'T FUCKING THINK SO.

+*( The math cyclops is crying and it's all your fault.


It's fatuous to assume that curst is using the + operator as we understand it for use under Z and its sub- and super-structures, especially since none of the elements participating in the operation are numbers. Especially fatuous is the assumption that the operation ("addition") has identity "0", interpreted so traditionally as an integer value. While + formally (typically) denotes a commutative operation, it's also not a given that SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!!! + boring = boring + SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!!!, nor is it a given that boring has an inverse under the operation.

But let's assume, in order to cut down on speculation and give your cyclops something to be more cheerful about, that + is a well-defined binary operation and SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!! and boring are elements of a set being operated upon, and we assume moreover that the set is closed under the operation. These qualifications are pure formalisms strictly for the cyclops' sake.

I find it much more plausible that "supply zones" is the operation identity, making boring + (-boring) = supply zones a simple MOF from an assumed group structure of game elements. That is to say: adding supply zones to any game does not improve any more than it degrades the quality of the game. Moreover, "SUPPLY ZONES" may be a divisor of the operation identity - not at all uncommon - with !!!!!!!! being the other divisor under an assumed ring structure of game elements (implying that SUPPLY ZONES * !!!!!!!! + anything = anything where SUPPLY ZONES + anything = anyotherthing.)

If your math cyclops is crying, I hope this brief detour into group and ring theory cheers him up. He will find further trenchant reading here and here, although commutative rings are but one of many sorts of rings he can learn about at that page.


Here you go overcomplicating and obfuscating things as usual. Curst's original statement becomes accurate when one looks at it in a boolean or set theoretical context.


Observe:

boring ∧ SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!!! = boring

Now, what does this remind you of? Slash fiction? Close!

The Identity Law states:

A ∨ 0 = A
A ∧ 1 = A


Given Kohan as empirical evidence, I think we can safely assume that SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!!! is true.

-/ES/-
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Here's your goddamn Kohan review by FABIO 08/24/2004, 11:15pm PDT NEW
    Short short version: a shitty realtime HOMM with autoresolved combat NT by Entropy Stew 08/25/2004, 4:35am PDT NEW
        Shorter version: Dungeon Siege, except ugly as fuck NT by curst 08/25/2004, 8:55am PDT NEW
            Whoops, I forgot: AND WITH SUPPLY ZONES! NT by curst 08/25/2004, 8:57am PDT NEW
    Re: Here's your goddamn Kohan review by Ice Cream Jonsey 08/27/2004, 4:23pm PDT NEW
        no, just the original Kohan by FABIO 08/28/2004, 12:11pm PDT NEW
            Re: no, just the original Kohan by curst 08/29/2004, 2:36pm PDT NEW
                Re: no, just the original Kohan by FABIO 08/29/2004, 2:39pm PDT NEW
                Re: no, just the original Kohan by William H. Hayt, Jr. 08/29/2004, 3:27pm PDT NEW
                    Re: no, just the original Kohan by Zseni 08/29/2004, 3:59pm PDT NEW
                        I hope everybody who read that feels as good about themselves as I do. +) NT by William H. Hayt, Jr. 08/29/2004, 4:13pm PDT NEW
                        Translated for those who don't read boring by Translator 08/29/2004, 7:22pm PDT NEW
                            HURRR I don't think and its great and stuff. NT by Dumb Guy 08/29/2004, 7:25pm PDT NEW
                                You don't know what you're missing. Overanalyzing quips and shit. NT by Smart Guy 08/29/2004, 9:37pm PDT NEW
                                    I don't use words like that and its boring. NT by Dumb Guy 08/29/2004, 9:58pm PDT NEW
                                        U Imp0st3r...duuuuurrrrr.... NT by Reel dUmb g|_|y 08/29/2004, 10:04pm PDT NEW
                                            a/s/l? NT by Dumb Gurl 08/29/2004, 10:08pm PDT NEW
                        Fun is the hour hand; it's now boring o'clock. Supply zones add 12 hours. NT by Ray of Light 08/29/2004, 8:26pm PDT NEW
                            She's stuck with a digital watch and all she can do is set her alarm. NT by Pieter 08/29/2004, 10:27pm PDT NEW
                            Even Ray is right twice a day by Entropy Stew 08/29/2004, 10:42pm PDT NEW
                                Meant to be in reply to Zseni, but you get the idea NT by Entropy Stew 08/29/2004, 10:44pm PDT NEW
                                Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Zseni 08/30/2004, 1:40pm PDT NEW
                                    Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Smart Guy 08/30/2004, 3:37pm PDT NEW
                                        Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Zseni 08/30/2004, 4:40pm PDT NEW
                                            Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Worm 08/30/2004, 4:50pm PDT NEW
                                                What's the Church's position on this thread? NT by Richard the Lionhear-UNF UNF UNF 08/30/2004, 5:00pm PDT NEW
                                                Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Zseni 08/30/2004, 5:36pm PDT NEW
                                                    Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Worm 08/30/2004, 6:31pm PDT NEW
                                                        Please answer yes. by CCHPW 08/30/2004, 7:33pm PDT NEW
                                                            Nope. NT by Worm 08/30/2004, 7:45pm PDT NEW
                                                                The suffering continues. NT by CCHPW 08/30/2004, 7:53pm PDT NEW
                                                        Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Zseni 08/30/2004, 8:04pm PDT NEW
                                    I took your post for an excuse to wax pedagogical. How wrong I was! by Entropy Stew 08/30/2004, 11:32pm PDT NEW
                                        Re: I took your post for an excuse to wax pedagogical. How wrong I was! by Zseni 08/31/2004, 10:53am PDT NEW
                                            Hur Hur Hur by Senseebl Obs 08/31/2004, 4:06pm PDT NEW
    hahaha by FABIO 05/16/2008, 4:19pm PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy