Forum Overview :: Operation: Hammer Time
 
Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by MOAB 03/31/2003, 4:58am PST
Zebco Fuckface wrote:

MOAB wrote:

Fox News has been discussing it for the last couple of hours but I can't find an article anywhere on the web. It seems Peter Arnett did an interview with Iraqi Television and suddenly began sucking thier poor oppressed cocks. MOTHERFUCKER DID IT LAST TIME TOO. It's edgy to call america evil when surrounded by pissed off arabs.


Except, of course, he's ENTIRELY FUCKING ACCURATE. Don't believe the right wing spin on everything - he said the US battle plan has failed. You know what? It has. Shock and Awe didn't work, we can't cover our supply lines, and now we're looking at house-to-house fighting in Baghdad.

Sorry.
Spectacular Kneejerking: You are the reason the democrats are in hiding, you are the reason the left looks retarded. Thank you for leaving a record of your idiocy.

You do not know "the plan," I do not know "the plan."Neither does peter arnett or tom brokaw or your hero grandfather. You are confused by what the media told you “the plan” was. Do you think that when all the pentagon assholes said, "We plan on lots of shock and awe." they were unzipping and dropping trou? DID YOU THINK THAT WAS THE PLAN? See we can't level Baghdad in front of peter and the cameras because it counters our entire "liberation" argument. What is happening 30 miles south of Baghdad and 15 miles north of the 101st is a mystery. MAYBE SOME RAGHEADS ARE BEING SHOCKED AND AWED AND SHITTING THEMSELVES OUT THERE? I DON'T KNOW. YOU DON'T EITHER.

Now you are telling me "the plan" is "house-to-house fighting in Baghdad," you will pardon me when I tell you that I do not take your word for it.

Other than the horribly terminal propaganda machine infuriating the entire middle-east, we seem to be kicking all of the ass. ALL of it. Did you think no one was going to shoot at us? Did you think we would be done in a week? Did you think the entire Iraqi nation was going to surrender? It is hard enough to calmly extract enough raw data from the reporting without the shit-stain of opinion, I am stunned you are letting yourself be spoonfed the stool from either side of center.

Sorry.
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by MOAB 03/30/2003, 8:55pm PST NEW
    Enh Robert Fisk did it last war, too. Remember when he got beaten up? NT by Senor Barborito 03/30/2003, 9:50pm PST NEW
        Fisk of the Fiskie Award (a.k.a. Idiotarian of the Year) for most stupid person. NT by Jhoh Creexul 03/31/2003, 12:15am PST NEW
    Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by Zebco Fuckface 03/31/2003, 4:15am PST NEW
        Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by MOAB 03/31/2003, 4:58am PST NEW
            actually by MOAB 03/31/2003, 6:18am PST NEW
            Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by foogla 03/31/2003, 7:23am PST NEW
                Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by MOAB 03/31/2003, 7:57am PST NEW
                    Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by t0ny 03/31/2003, 1:52pm PST NEW
                        Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by MOAB 03/31/2003, 3:47pm PST NEW
                        Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by E. L. Koba 03/31/2003, 11:31pm PST NEW
                            Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by Mysterio 04/01/2003, 12:04am PST NEW
                                That's 3:1. According to Napoleon and B.H.L. Hart, anyway. NT by Chairman mao 04/01/2003, 12:23am PST NEW
                                    Re: That's 3:1. According to Napoleon and B.H.L. Hart, anyway. by foogla 04/01/2003, 3:02am PST NEW
                                        Re: That's 3:1. According to Napoleon and B.H.L. Hart, anyway. by Mike McMac 04/01/2003, 3:22am PST NEW
                                            Re: That's 3:1. According to Napoleon and B.H.L. Hart, anyway. by foogla 04/01/2003, 7:48am PST NEW
                                                Re: That's 3:1. According to Napoleon and B.H.L. Hart, anyway. by FOF 04/01/2003, 9:56am PST NEW
                                                    Re: That's 3:1. According to Napoleon and B.H.L. Hart, anyway. by Slappy 04/02/2003, 2:24am PST NEW
                            Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by Chairman mao 04/01/2003, 12:21am PST NEW
                                Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by E. L. Koba 04/01/2003, 10:48pm PST NEW
            There was a plan, just not this one by Damocles 04/01/2003, 10:21am PST NEW
                By the way, if you want spin-free news... by Damocles 04/01/2003, 10:27am PST NEW
    Peter Arnett was fired and apologized for his comments - don't remember Fisk NT by apologizing. SB 03/31/2003, 10:17am PST NEW
    Reporters strike another blow against the US war machine. by conflictNo 03/31/2003, 6:28pm PST NEW
        Re: Reporters strike another blow against the US war machine. by Entropy Stew 03/31/2003, 6:51pm PST NEW
        Let us pray for the men Rivera betrayed today . . . by Senor Barborito 03/31/2003, 7:09pm PST NEW
            Our child soldiers will melt their hearts. AND THEIR FACES. WITH FLAMES. by conflictNo 03/31/2003, 7:23pm PST NEW
                Re: Our child soldiers will melt their hearts. AND THEIR FACES. WITH FLAMES. by MOAB 03/31/2003, 7:29pm PST NEW
                    I'd use him as an extra layer of tank armor by Entropy Stew 03/31/2003, 7:40pm PST NEW
                        Re: I'd use him as an extra layer of tank armor by t0ny 04/01/2003, 3:38pm PST NEW
    Re: Peter Arnett goes Anti-USA (again)? by Zebco Fuckface 04/01/2003, 11:49pm PST NEW
 
powered by pointy