|
by Senor Barborito 04/02/2003, 11:18pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
moremedsplz wrote:
Senor Barborito wrote:
except moremedzplz, who didn't give a legit name
You said that I didn't give a legit name. Now it seems we have some new rules? As much as it pains me to join the complacent masses here, we should probably let this drop -- I'm only gonna get meaner and you're only gonna get more crazy. I'll let this one go on humanitarian grounds.
Yeah from here on out I'll let ES defend it, because that tally was his call, not mine. Not a rule, just how it was decided to tally votes is all. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
ES and I have come to an agreement - we will handle this like BDR by Senor Barborito 04/02/2003, 10:47pm PST 
Whaaaaaaa? by moremedsplz 04/02/2003, 11:00pm PST
ES's decision, shove it. by Senor Barborito 04/02/2003, 11:03pm PST
Uh, no. by moremedsplz 04/02/2003, 11:12pm PST
Agreed, let's drop it. by Senor Barborito 04/02/2003, 11:18pm PST
Why this required a vote I will never understand. by mark 04/04/2003, 10:18am PST
Well by Senor Barborito 04/04/2003, 10:36am PST
I wasn't looking for a confessional. I was just commenting. NT by mark 04/04/2003, 11:29pm PST
please stay behind the curtain as much as possible by ydrt 04/04/2003, 12:38pm PST
Re: please stay behind the curtain as much as possible by FABIO 04/04/2003, 4:25pm PST
The link, it goes nowhere -nt- by Entropy Stew 04/04/2003, 4:32pm PST
supposed to reply to ES NT by FABIO 04/05/2003, 1:32am PST
ARG! This was a misdirected reply to SB about my misdirected reply to ES NT by FABIO 04/05/2003, 1:32am PST
Re: ARG! This was a misdirected reply to SB about my misdirected reply to ES by ydrt 04/05/2003, 2:29am PST
works for me, honey NT by FABIO 04/04/2003, 6:45pm PST
Doesn't for me, sugar. NT by Senor Barborito 04/04/2003, 9:06pm PST
Mystery solved, part II by Ray, of Light 04/05/2003, 2:05am PST
|
|
