|
by Fussbett 12/11/2005, 3:51am PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Someone wrote fake information on Wikipedia (I know, I can barely believe it myself. Try to catch your breath.) about John Seigenthaler, saying he was suspected in the assassinations of the Kennedy brothers. John Seigenthaler wigged out.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm
I have no idea whose sick mind conceived the false, malicious "biography" that appeared under my name for 132 days on Wikipedia, the popular, online, free encyclopedia whose authors are unknown and virtually untraceable.
And so we live in a universe of new media with phenomenal opportunities for worldwide communications and research — but populated by volunteer vandals with poison-pen intellects. Congress has enabled them and protects them.
When I was a child, my mother lectured me on the evils of "gossip." She held a feather pillow and said, "If I tear this open, the feathers will fly to the four winds, and I could never get them back in the pillow. That's how it is when you spread mean things about people."
Who is this geezer? "John Seigenthaler, a retired journalist, founded The Freedom Forum First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University." Hilarious! He fought for your rights to scatter the feathers to the winds, and now he realizes the mistake he's made.
The villain was smoked out by a noble troll hunter.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002677060_wiki11.html
...he was slowly being cornered in cyberspace, thanks to the sleuthing efforts of Daniel Brandt, 57, of San Antonio, Texas, who makes his living as a book indexer. Brandt has been a frequent critic of Wikipedia and started an anti-Wikipedia Web site in September after reading what he said was a false entry about himself.
So the dude who wrote the bad stuff confessed, and quit his job working for a courier company, since the company was being bothered by the troll hunter and reporters. Despite devoting 3 USA Today paragaphs to his legal proceedings, Seigenthaler granted clemency to his false biographer. The end... FOR WIKIPEDIA?! No. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|