|
by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 11:27pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
1. Now you're just being silly. In debate, anyone's viewpoint, and anything you can do to sway people's opinion is fair game. I was only remarking on the effectiveness of one manner of debate. As for arrogance, you make assumptions without proof that they may possibly be correct. Perhaps you should remark less on combat technique and throw some fucking knives instead. Reaching up your colon to hurl an ad hominem defense AFTER you call me an anti-semetic Nazi troll, but just before you accuse me of being arrogant, makes me unlikely to accept your critique. If I appear to be arrogant it's only because I am always right (about everything, always) and you are in awe of me. It's RIGHT for you to feel that way. It's acceptable.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
2. Now that is something of interest.
RRRGGG!!! WHAT MAKES YOU THINK I CARE WHAT INTERESTS YOU?!?!?
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
Yes, the supreme court decided that libel by parody is rediculous... The Supreme Court can also order people that spell ridiculous like that put to death. They wouldn't ADMIT it, they would obfuscate it under a ton of homeland security shit. But they could kill you for that. Just saying.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
that does not change the fact that he used J. Jaques's artwork (which is copyrighted), nor does it change the fact that nobody at the forum was impressed by what he did. All he got was dismissal and a couple of insults... not much of a trolling accomplishment. Thank you. That's a very valid point. He hasn't accomplished anything, has he? Though, now that we've ascertained that it's within his legal rights, he should SELL his work. I mean, you point out how popular the (shitty) original is, I imagine he could make a tidy pile of cash with his hilarious parody work. The best part is that if he doesn't, anyone else can. Thanks, that was a great idea and if you have done nothing else by coming here, you have given us that.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
4. I realize that these forums have no moderator, and no way of banning... I referred to the types of forums from which you can be banned, as the OP found out when he was unable to view the QC forums. Are there any other types of things you feel like explaining to me?
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
5. I say he was trolling, because he made this thread we currently post in (stating his obvious dislike for the comic), and also because he went on the comic's forums to see what sort of reactions he would get for the behavior he outlined in the first post of this thread.
Nice definition, you know who else is a troll under those same conditions? THOMAS FUCKING PAINE. Here's you burning all his pamphlets. No wonder you hate the Bill of Rights so much. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by I need clarification 02/28/2007, 11:48pm PST 
Epic! Way to keep QCMerch up to the point of EXHAUSTION NT by Fussbett 03/01/2007, 12:00am PST 
My favorite kind of webcomic, where jokes aren't appreciated. NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 1:20am PST 
I said "wow!" by Jerry Whorebach 03/01/2007, 1:31am PST 
I didn't work very hard on mine. :( by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 1:54am PST 
Any work of fiction improves when the characters all start talking like Creexul. NT by Tony 03/01/2007, 3:46pm PST 
yup, INC is definitely a father now by fatherhood curse 03/01/2007, 2:08am PST 
Holy shit, way to annouce your taste in cocks. NT by TENCHI? 03/01/2007, 2:14am PST 
Creexul knows of Tenchi, and he fucked Sassy. Have you? NT by fatherhood curse 03/01/2007, 2:20am PST 
High five? NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 2:40am PST 
He actually didn't, and everyone else did. Anything else? NT by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 12:00pm PST 
WE'RE STILL WORKING OUT THE TECHNICALITIES NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 10:02pm PST 
You created a whole screenname just to announce you suck. I'm proud of you, son. NT by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 2:37am PST 
Re: yup, INC is definitely a father now by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 10:59am PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 2:30pm PST 
You're an addict :( NT by mark 03/01/2007, 2:50pm PST 
But every junkie's like a settin' sun NT by Neil Young 03/01/2007, 2:54pm PST 
I hope the other QC fans don't show up... by Jerry Whorebach 03/01/2007, 2:51pm PST 
it's a novelty name. by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 3:00pm PST 
Re: it's a novelty name. by mark 03/01/2007, 3:04pm PST 
Monocle firmly in place here. NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 10:13pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 3:04pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 3:18pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 3:35pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 3:53pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 4:14pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 7:17pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 8:36pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 8:46pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Neil Young 03/01/2007, 9:01pm PST 
ad homiWHAT? by Fussbett 03/01/2007, 9:23pm PST 
your retort is like swiss cheese- it's full of holes NT by Flabby-o 03/02/2007, 2:57am PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 9:45pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Fussbett 03/01/2007, 9:10pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 11:27pm PST 
Your Ad hominem attacks do nothing to earn you favor with me! >:( NT by Mischief Onlooker 03/01/2007, 6:35pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 4:40pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 7:22pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 7:25pm PST 
I was wondering how you would respond, and I said to myself - Double Post! NT by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 8:38pm PST 
It was a connection problem. by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 8:41pm PST 
Well, we're probably going to ban you for that. NT by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 9:05pm PST 
You read my (fucking) mind. NT by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 10:52pm PST 
Please cut to the case by motherfuckerfoodeater 03/01/2007, 9:36pm PST 
My connection was a bit problematic at the time I was NT by in bed 03/01/2007, 10:00pm PST 
Please stop trying NT by it only makes you more of an idiot 03/03/2007, 3:29am PST 
Is there an undeleted thread over there about this? by Ice Cream Jonsey 03/03/2007, 3:15pm PST 
There might just be. by mark 03/03/2007, 4:23pm PST 
Re: There might just be. by Ice Cream Jonsey 03/03/2007, 6:52pm PST 
Re: There might just be. by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/04/2007, 12:06am PST 
That guy joined here yesterday (sunglasses) and was banned immediately. NT by motherfuckerfoodeater 03/04/2007, 2:05pm PST 
YEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGHH! NT by Schadenfreude 03/04/2007, 3:42pm PST 
Furry Furrier. Heh by The Shadow of Anonymity 03/03/2007, 10:57pm PST 
Mark needs to post those logs NT by Flavio 03/19/2007, 2:51am PDT 
If only clapstro had more threads like this. by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/20/2007, 3:31am PDT 
A small, maybe funny portion by mark 03/21/2007, 1:53pm PDT 
Is INC's name really Ben Stein? by Stroker Ace (Posts: 4,530) 03/21/2007, 2:18pm PDT 
I'M COMING TO HIS HOUSE TO KILL HIM RIGHT NOW by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/21/2007, 4:52pm PDT 
Alex NT by MobyGames 03/22/2007, 3:04am PDT 
Re: Alex by laudablepuss 03/22/2007, 2:53pm PDT 
Hey now. NT by Herb Goldfarb 03/22/2007, 3:09pm PDT 
JJJJJJaques finally gives in to INC's terrorist demands? by Swiss Cheese 03/23/2007, 1:19pm PDT 
BURN on you! by Mischief Maker 03/27/2007, 9:28am PDT 
Serves you right for forgetting to check the file size of an image before upload NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/27/2007, 10:12am PDT 
They shut the forum down on January 1st, 2023 NT by Ichabod 07/10/2023, 9:17pm PDT 
Anyone have the full size of the picture in this? by jauwh 04/09/2013, 10:38am PDT 
Adventures of attempting to recreate. by jauwh 04/09/2013, 11:55am PDT 
Adoft Adolf WHATEVER NT by jauwh 04/09/2013, 12:07pm PDT 
Re: Adventures of attempting to recreate. by laudablepuss 04/09/2013, 12:35pm PDT 
Also, it's "heebs" :) NT by laudablepuss 04/09/2013, 12:43pm PDT 
Re: Adventures of attempting to recreate. by Mysterios 04/09/2013, 5:44pm PDT 
"Dining at the V" NT by V for Vagina 04/09/2013, 2:03pm PDT 
^^Shut-in alert^^ NT by Mysterio 04/09/2013, 2:18pm PDT 
It's Y as in YMCA (young men's christian association). by jauwh 04/09/2013, 11:02pm PDT 
Here;s how it looks these days. by Ichabod 07/25/2020, 10:09pm PDT 
It passes the techno-Bechdel test by y-You're Beautiful 07/26/2020, 9:47am PDT 
Something that might be lost in the post of the AIM log by Mysterio 07/10/2023, 9:26pm PDT 
Like Penny Arcade, this got too awful to even make fun of anymore by wacky robo trannies 07/11/2023, 1:04am PDT 
This is very much giving the same vibe nortverse.com NT by Ichabod 12/06/2023, 6:47pm PST 
|
|