|
by Zsenitan 01/14/2008, 1:48am PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
I wish I could hyperlink a hyperlink, because I want to force everyone to start out with everything Harry Hutton has ever written about Christopher Hitchens. Like this, for example.
But first: Slate + The Hitch = fantastic?
The Hitch Snitches wrote:
Or perhaps not. Isn't there something pathetic and embarrassing about this emphasis on shade? And why is a man with a white mother considered to be "black," anyway?
YEAH WHO DOES HE THINK HE IS anyway. His mother is probably IRISH.
The Hitch Bitches wrote:
One can't exactly say that Sen. Obama himself panders to questions of skin color. One of the best chapters of his charming autobiography describes the moment when his black Republican opponent in the Illinois Senate race—Alan Keyes—accused him of possessing insufficient negritude because he wasn't the descendant of slaves! Obama's decision to be light-hearted—and perhaps light-skinned—about this was a milestone in itself. But are we not in danger of emulating Keyes' insane mistake every time we bang on about the senator's pigmentation?
I honestly thought this would be the topper, but then Chris pops out the move beautiful baby RACIST MISTAKE.
The Hitch Verb-The-Rhymes-With-Hitch-and-means-RUN UP THE NOOSE ALREADY wrote:
Last week happened to be the week that the nation of Kenya—birthplace of Obama's father—was convulsed by a political war that contained ghastly overtones of violent and sadistic tribalism. It would sound as absurd to a Kenyan to hear praise for a black candidate as it would sound to most of my European readers to hear a recommendation of a "great white hope."
That is: Kenyans - violent spearchuckers - have NOTHING BUT black candidates, and it hasn't really worked out for them now has it. White America, where are you on this deal?! |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|