 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Re: Devil's Rejects syndrome by bombMexico 04/11/2008, 1:18am PDT | ||||
 |
 |
|||
FABIO wrote: Casino Royale was fine. It had people being shot in all the right places and hey a freerunning villain. But i was allright with the Brosnan movies too. I'm not going to pay to see them or anything crazy, but i'm very much ok with a world where a suitcase full of diamonds can blow up in your face and you become supervillain Diamondface instead of rich. Also i didn't have to pay money to watch my action hero play cards, with an intermission from playing in case the card playing action was too intense. The Bourne movies have car chases and Extreme Ways and "Look at what they make you give" and fight scenes that are mostly watchable. Liking/disliking Bourne should replace whatever current test they have for gauging how retarded retards are. |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Cain is for Delta, Charlie is for Cain by 04/08/2008, 1:44am PDT  The microwave has a mono beeper AND a mechanical dinger? Come on. NT by 04/08/2008, 1:54pm PDT You didn't like Casino Royale? NT by 04/08/2008, 6:54pm PDT Devil's Rejects syndrome by 04/09/2008, 2:52pm PDT This is why I read Libertas, because they give bad reviews to whatever BM likes by 04/09/2008, 3:36pm PDT Plus the novelty of a movie James Bond acting like the book James Bond. NT by 04/09/2008, 6:13pm PDT People read the books? NT by 04/12/2008, 1:21am PDT Re: Devil's Rejects syndrome by 04/11/2008, 1:18am PDT I like Bourne, I guess. Does that compromise your test? :( NT by 04/11/2008, 2:46am PDT No. You're not positive it's a good movie. The test stands! NT by 04/11/2008, 8:07pm PDT |
