Forum Overview :: Peter Molyneux's The Movies
 
Re: You fail by whydirt 12/26/2004, 7:15pm PST
Kate Monday wrote:

whydirt wrote:

Step 1: Take the number of Wilson brothers and square it.
Step 2: Add one for an appearance by Bill Murray

Final number is measured on a five-point scale.


Not counting cameos (Owen in Rushmore, Andrew in Tenenbaums):

Bottle Rocket: 9
Rushmore: 5
Royal Tenenbaums: 5
Life Aquatic: 2

You'll notice that these results make no sense.
That was just the Alpha release of my scale. Thanks for the user feedback; it's always appreciated! I admit that I forgot about the third Wilson, who fucks up my original formula. If you exclude him (and Owen's cameo in Rushmore), you get a much more reasonable 4, 2, 5, and 2. I think squaring the Wilson total may have been my mistake. I also think Willem Dafoe should add an extra point, bringing Life Aquatic up to a 3, which brings it up to match what I've seen from the previews.
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Napolean Dynamite = hilarious by Fullofkittens 12/26/2004, 2:20pm PST NEW
    :( by Choson 12/26/2004, 4:25pm PST NEW
        FUCK RUSHMORE NT by Worm 12/26/2004, 4:30pm PST NEW
            Please write a review of it by Choson 12/26/2004, 4:41pm PST NEW
                Never saw it, all the same fuck it. by Worm 12/26/2004, 5:48pm PST NEW
                    You get zero gold stars. NT by I need clarification 12/26/2004, 6:33pm PST NEW
                        Well, no shit. It just fails as a reason against "FUCK RUSHMORE". NT by Worm 12/26/2004, 7:19pm PST NEW
                            This is what happens when you respond to worm, INC. by Mysterio 12/26/2004, 7:34pm PST NEW
                                MORE BABBEL! by Worm 12/26/2004, 8:02pm PST NEW
                                    Re: MORE BABBEL! by Choson 12/26/2004, 8:03pm PST NEW
                                        Worm = Bad Reviews & Ennui. Chant it well spinning in front of your mirror. NT by and he'll appear 12/26/2004, 8:09pm PST NEW
            How to determine the value of a Wes Anderson film, objectively: by whydirt 12/26/2004, 5:59pm PST NEW
                You fail by Kate Monday 12/26/2004, 6:57pm PST NEW
                    Re: You fail by whydirt 12/26/2004, 7:15pm PST NEW
        I don't see that at all. by Fullofkittens 12/26/2004, 4:42pm PST NEW
            Re: I don't see that at all. by Choson 12/26/2004, 4:56pm PST NEW
        You're dumb, no (NT) by Kthor 12/26/2004, 7:17pm PST NEW
            Re: You're dumb, no (NT) by Choson 12/26/2004, 7:55pm PST NEW
    was this a better horror movie than The Thing too? NT by FABIO 12/26/2004, 7:14pm PST NEW
        GUH by Fullofkittens 12/26/2004, 7:20pm PST NEW
 
powered by pointy