Mysterio wrote:

Because you can just post a message here (like you did).

Is that a BOOK of icycalm's? I can't believe that shrill faggot went to the bother of putting his inane nonsense into actual paper. That's the funniest thing I've ever seen. Thank-you for posting it.

Icycalm wrote:

But that's subhumans for you: studies even show that strictly speaking, subhumans do not read , but merely skim, registering at most two or three words out of several dozen, and making the rest up (blah blah blah)

Icycalm wrote:

IT IS STUPID TO EQUATE ARCADE GAMES WITH SCORING since many of them EITHER DON'T HAVE SCORING or have scoring systems that are obviously gratuitous and superfluous.

Icycalm wrote:

So finally we realize the scoring debacle came about due to natural, historical reasons, and is being perpetuated and even exacerbated and apotheosized, despite it's obvious obsolescence, by:

1. The stupidity, incompetence and commercial considerations of designers (who lack the intelligence necessary to understand why scoring mechanics are inimical to progress, the talent necessary to keep complexifying their games with properly integrated mechanics, and who moreover need the dual mechanics model so as not to scare away new players).

2. The stupidity, exhibitionism and lack of proper life experiences of the aspies ( who etc ...)

3. The weakness and stupidity of new players and casual players (who etc ...)