|
by Entropy Stew 01/30/2003, 8:35pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
I need clarification wrote:
Are helicopters getting harder to fly, or are they getting so easy that we forget to train people to actually fly them? Or maybe we're using Firefox technology, and none of our pilots speak Russian.
I know I tried to play a PC helicopter sim once (Voxel technology!) and next to reading the Caltrops rants forum it was the worst experience I've ever had in front of a computer.
Perhaps screamingmonkeylabs.com would be more your speed, Clutch.
So, maybe it's just too hard to fly helicopters and we should go back to dirigibles.
Whatever the case, so far the score is something like Iraqis 20, Americans 0, and the war hasn't even officially started yet. We need a little more Blackhawk Up, I think. At the very least, can we say the Iraqis have developed weapons of mass helicopter magnetism and are placing them under the sand? That's as good a reason to invade as any.
This really doesn't surprise me; helicopters and Harriers are the two hardest aircraft to fly. Helicopters also routinly fly just above treetop level, which is leaves them small a small margin of error. Throw those in with the (possible) fact that the chances of a soldier dying were actually higher during normal peacetime operations than in Desert Storm (I've heard this several times from different sources, but I'll still disclaim it to be unsubstantied since I don't feel like looking it up myself), and you have a recipe for flaming machinery littering the landscape.
-/ES/- |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|