|
by ITES 09/05/2003, 11:31am PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Roop Dirump wrote:
Secret Barborito wrote:
Consider something, Roop - every rule on this site is an extension of one principle:
DO NOT BREAK THE LAW AND DO NOT MAKE THE ADMINS WORK MORE THAN THEY HAVE TO.
Considering the only way to get banned is by making us have to work needlessly or legally jeapordizing the site, why is it wrong for me to be relieved when someone who makes me work for no good reason is gone for good?
Nor is all or even most of GA banned. People at GA who broke our rules are, but the 25% or so of people there that get off on following me around the Internet actively ruining anything I touch are not the majority of that channel - i still talk daily quite a bit to many of the people from the channel on IM. I do realize that irksome minority makes me a liability to Caltrops, and that's why I'm going to be trying to minimize my own role around here ala ES.
All of this has been said before, but there it is one more time just for you, Roop. Are you satisfied now?
--SB
I've never read a forum where there is so much paranoia about the internet cops, so much paranoia about being liable. Here's a thread on Gone Gold where every other post somebody talks about software they've warezed. O NO! Call the Internet Cops, hit DELETE DELETE DELETE Quick the shade wearing suits are going to bust through the apartment doors and throw me to the floor! What did they do? He called a few posters idiots, deleted the granny porn tag, then locked the topic so people stop posting, let it sink. BUT IT'S STILL ON THEIR SERVERS O NO! It's like the moderator shrugs and closes the topic and forgets it. No heart attacks, no drama. It's like, "big fucking deal." I know of forums where people actively talk about warez and trade software, they haven't gone anywhere, they've been up for years. Before you'll ever be a target of the internet police, there are far bigger fish. There are no internet cops, and they wouldn't give a fuck about this site if there were. All this work people are making for you? It's You.
Yeah, funny, I don't see anything about a Jihad for the admins' heads in there. Regardless, nobdy makes any decisions for SB or I because we are the legally liable ones. It really doesn't help the matter when you have a site that invites people to sue you for libel (assuming we ever got popular). My ass, my rules (until I transfer it over to BDR).
That Fussbett, making all that work for you by providing the best content. What a headache.
When the fuck have I called Fussbett on any content? I like Fussbett's stuff, and have always said so. I fired him because WORKING WITH HIM SUCKS
The GA people trying to destroy Caltrops? Nobody was trying to destroy anything, they were just pushing your buttons. Successfully.
I'm not even getting into this shit again, other than to say SB is infinitely justified in it.
For every person you ban, make a goal to try and attract one new person to this forum to replace them, it would make your finger less itchy. It's easier to kill something than it is to build something, all I'm saying. Just think through what you're doing.
No, we never do that!
If OMM had had your rules, you never would have met Veronica. You would have been BANNED.
Roop
Or he could have just started in the forums when he was 18, or he could have lied about his age.
-/ES/- |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Holy shit, what happened while I was away? by I need clarification 09/03/2003, 4:12am PDT 
What? NT by foogla 09/03/2003, 8:15am PDT 
We called each other fags. by Bill Dungsroman 09/03/2003, 11:58am PDT 
I stand corrected. AND ERECTED. by I need clarification 09/03/2003, 3:02pm PDT 
Re: I stand corrected. AND ERECTED. by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/03/2003, 7:36pm PDT 
Re: I stand corrected. AND ERECTED. by laudablepuss 09/03/2003, 9:47pm PDT 
Re: I stand corrected. AND ERECTED. by I need clarification 09/04/2003, 12:48am PDT 
Prepare for another searing dose of burning hot stuff. by laudablepuss 09/04/2003, 6:47am PDT 
Re: Prepare for another searing dose of burning hot stuff. by FoK 09/04/2003, 1:22pm PDT 
Can I have ONE FUCKING POST that's not ruined by a typo? NT by FoK 09/04/2003, 1:23pm PDT 
Re: I stand corrected. AND ERECTED. by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/04/2003, 11:24am PDT 
At least we're not retarded NT by Entropy Stew 09/04/2003, 1:05pm PDT 
ARE YOU SAYING THAT I'M RETARTED AND CRAZY? NT by Apocheir 09/04/2003, 2:07pm PDT 
No wait the admins are retarded too. NT by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/04/2003, 2:17pm PDT 
You are becoming irritating. NT by creativepig 09/04/2003, 2:31pm PDT 
No you are. NT by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/04/2003, 4:36pm PDT 
Forums falling apart. Readers upset. NT by Announcer. 09/04/2003, 5:54pm PDT 
I think the forums already fell apart. :( NT by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/04/2003, 7:35pm PDT 
"Firing" Fussbett wasn't retarded? NT by FABIO 09/04/2003, 5:45pm PDT 
Taking the "Firing" serious was retarded. NT by foogla 09/04/2003, 6:34pm PDT 
You're stupid by I need clarification 09/04/2003, 6:54pm PDT 
Holy fuck, your reading comprehension sucks NT by ITES 09/04/2003, 6:56pm PDT 
But you're idiotic! by I need clarification 09/04/2003, 8:31pm PDT 
Legally we would have zero choice. None. NT by Senor Barborito 09/04/2003, 8:46pm PDT 
No, actually, it wasn't by ITES 09/04/2003, 7:17pm PDT 
Re: No, actually, it wasn't by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/04/2003, 7:33pm PDT 
Re: No, actually, it wasn't by ITES 09/04/2003, 8:05pm PDT 
Re: No, actually, it wasn't by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/04/2003, 8:12pm PDT 
Shut the fuck up. They are doing a fine job. NT by Apocheir 09/04/2003, 9:12pm PDT 
Might want to ban this one, SB, he's clearly a minor. NT by Mysterio 09/04/2003, 9:23pm PDT 
He's almost a minor, not quite. NT by Senor Barborito 09/04/2003, 9:34pm PDT 
Of...? NT by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/05/2003, 12:10pm PDT 
Re: No, actually, it wasn't by I need clarification 09/04/2003, 8:30pm PDT 
Ask a mirror that same question. NT by Senor Barborito 09/04/2003, 8:32pm PDT 
I think I'm glue, when in fact I want to be rubber NT by I need clarification 09/04/2003, 9:18pm PDT 
. . . . NT by Secret Barborito 09/05/2003, 7:41am PDT 
Yes it was by Roop Dirump 09/05/2003, 7:15am PDT 
Uh-huh by Secret Barborito 09/05/2003, 7:38am PDT 
Re: Uh-huh by Roop Dirump 09/05/2003, 9:52am PDT 
Have you been reading the same forum I have? by ITES 09/05/2003, 11:31am PDT 
I think Roop is right actually! SORRY NT by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/05/2003, 11:44am PDT 
The only thread still active... by I need clarification 09/05/2003, 2:57pm PDT 
Also... by I need clarification 09/05/2003, 2:58pm PDT 
Re: Also... by junior allen 09/05/2003, 5:06pm PDT 
Re: Also... by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/05/2003, 7:21pm PDT 
Re: Also... by junior allen 09/06/2003, 10:13am PDT 
Re: Also... by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/06/2003, 1:54pm PDT 
Re: Also... by junior allen 09/06/2003, 7:00pm PDT 
Re: Also... by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/06/2003, 7:13pm PDT 
Re: Also... by junior allen 09/06/2003, 7:29pm PDT 
Re: Also... by Chaiman Mao 09/06/2003, 7:32pm PDT 
Re: Also... by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/06/2003, 8:32pm PDT 
You and INC display traumatic levels of stupidity. You're still here. by Senor Barborito 09/06/2003, 9:02pm PDT 
Re: You and INC display traumatic levels of stupidity. You're still here. by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/07/2003, 1:53am PDT 
That's right. While I was mrs. johnson, there was pity. Now there is hate. NT by Apocheir 09/07/2003, 3:49am PDT 
It is because people do not recognize you. NT by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/07/2003, 4:55am PDT 
I must have developed some gay with this whole name change business. NT by Apocheir 09/07/2003, 5:07am PDT 
Changing one's nick is pretty gay in general. That's why I refrain. NT by Senor Barborito 09/07/2003, 9:20am PDT 
If it'll make everyone feel better... NT by mrs. johnson 09/07/2003, 4:21pm PDT 
It didn't help that you picked an even more effeminate nick NT by Bill Dungsroman 09/07/2003, 10:49pm PDT 
It was just more French.... Oh. NT by mrs. johnson 09/08/2003, 1:04am PDT 
Perhaps you should have went with mrs. flurgendorf johnson? NT by The Custodian 09/07/2003, 11:38am PDT 
Maybe K Thor could send evil_ducks over here. NT by Fullofkittens 09/06/2003, 8:35pm PDT 
What? Do the links to the other forums not work on your browser? NT by laudablepuss 09/05/2003, 4:09pm PDT 
My mistake by I need clarification 09/05/2003, 6:54pm PDT 
You're an idiot by laudablepuss 09/06/2003, 8:10pm PDT 
Have you been on the same internet I have? by Roop Dirump 09/05/2003, 5:15pm PDT 
Roop is right. by corax 09/05/2003, 6:56pm PDT 
Obviously not by ITES 09/05/2003, 7:12pm PDT 
Let me summarize so this can stop by Apocheir 09/05/2003, 7:28pm PDT 
Christ, shouldn't you have fucked off by now? by I need clarification 09/05/2003, 7:55pm PDT 
I'd think of a witty reply, but you're generally disliked, so I don't have to. NT by Apocheir 09/05/2003, 8:31pm PDT 
I'll take that acquiesence as a sign you are, indeed, moving on. Thanks. NT by I need clarification 09/05/2003, 9:00pm PDT 
Let me give you the clarification you so desire: shut the fuck up. NT by Apocheir 09/05/2003, 10:00pm PDT 
OHHHHHHHH (NIGGA) by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/05/2003, 10:03pm PDT 
Holy shit, I never thought my screenname could be turned on me like that! by I need clarification 09/05/2003, 10:07pm PDT 
HE'S DISLIKED FOR BEING SUCH AN EVIL TROLL SOB NT by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/05/2003, 9:23pm PDT 
My Plan, or CALTROPS WILL EAT ITSELF by Bill Dungsroman 09/05/2003, 10:10pm PDT 
Re: My Plan, or CALTROPS WILL EAT ITSELF by I need clarification 09/05/2003, 10:23pm PDT 
Three words: by Bill Dungsroman 09/05/2003, 10:28pm PDT 
Re: My Plan, or CALTROPS WILL EAT ITSELF by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/05/2003, 10:54pm PDT 
Unfortunately I AM required to respond to this one, at least. by Senor Barborito 09/05/2003, 11:17pm PDT 
Re: Unfortunately I AM required to respond to this one, at least. by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/06/2003, 12:37am PDT 
Re: My Plan, or CALTROPS WILL EAT ITSELF by Roop Dirump 09/05/2003, 11:20pm PDT 
Re: My Plan, or CALTROPS WILL EAT ITSELF by FABIO 09/09/2003, 12:37pm PDT 
Insane and Insanier by I need clarification 09/05/2003, 7:57pm PDT 
Saying it often makes it true! NT by ITES 09/05/2003, 10:03pm PDT 
Truing it makes us say it often. NT by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/05/2003, 10:05pm PDT 
You should have written that in huge letters. by I need clarification 09/05/2003, 10:08pm PDT 
Cran-grape posts will save this site by FABIO 09/09/2003, 12:18pm PDT 
never mind! NT by Roop Dirump 09/05/2003, 8:59pm PDT 
Re: Obviously not by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/05/2003, 9:17pm PDT 
PS by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/05/2003, 9:22pm PDT 
Thanks, I like that! by Insane Tyrannosaurus ES 09/03/2003, 7:50pm PDT 
Re: Holy shit, what happened while I was away? by laudablepuss 09/03/2003, 2:24pm PDT 
You burned me. by I need clarification 09/03/2003, 3:02pm PDT 
I liked this thread except for the posts by Creexul NT by Ebert's Fat Cock 09/07/2003, 1:56am PDT 
What's wrong with your lips you fat fuck? NT by Siskel's putrid bone 09/07/2003, 2:18am PDT 
|
|